Cited by 1Ancient Near East HistoryAncient Egypt and ArchaeologyAncient Mediterranean Archaeology and History

Études sur l’époque archaïque

Open access
Godron, Gérard·1958·Bulletin de l'Institut français d'archéologie orientale

Abstract

Godron Gérard. Études sur l’époque archaïque. In: Bulletin de l'Institut français d'archéologie orientale, Tome 57, 1958. pp. 143-155.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3406/bifao.1958.2168

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Djer tablet date was confidently identified as referring to Sekhat-Hor, the form of Hathor, and therefore does not contain a Sothic reference.

    “Back in 1958, the first of these two dates was confidently identified as referring to Sekhat-Hor, the form of Hathor, and therefore does not contain a Sothic refe-rence [Godron 1958, 146-149, Fig. 1].”

    From Sothic Dating of the Egyptian Old Kingdom (2024) · cites this paper as Godron 1958

    Section I identifies the Djer tablet as a mention of Sékhat-Ḥor, and on p. 146 Godron rejects reading a sign as the year sign, challenging the Sothic interpretation he recounts there. The passages available from our copy do not explicitly establish that Sékhat-Ḥor is a form of Hathor or state that the tablet contains no Sothic reference. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Godron, G.
Corresponding author
Godron, Gérard
Venue
Bulletin de l'Institut français d'archéologie orientale
Published
1958
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
143-155
ISSN
0255-0962 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410505760
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
Locations
  • Bulletin de l Institut français d archéologie orientale (publishedVersion)
  • Persée (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
Keywords
Archaic period, ancient Near East, Near Eastern archaeology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review