CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6Classical Studies and PhilologyChinese history and philosophyHistorical and Literary Analyses

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Les débuts de la littérature en chinois vulgaire

Demiéville, Paul·1952·Comptes-rendus des séances de l année - Académie des inscriptions et belles-lettres
DOI 10.3406/crai.1952.10015
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Demiéville Paul. Les débuts de la littérature en chinois vulgaire. In: Comptes rendus des séances de l'Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, 96ᵉ année, N. 4, 1952. pp. 563-571.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3406/crai.1952.10015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Demiéville, P.
Corresponding author
Demiéville, Paul
Venue
Comptes-rendus des séances de l année - Académie des inscriptions et belles-lettres
Publisher
PERSEE Program
Published
1952
Volume
96
Issue
4
Pages
563-571
ISSN
0065-0536 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3406/crai.1952.10015
OpenAlex
W2028183099
Semantic Scholar
152b758cb2d5e530eca94aa4d1c7747aba2e72ec
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Comptes-rendus des séances de l année - Académie des inscriptions et belles-lettres (publishedVersion)
  • Persée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Historical and Literary Analyses
Keywords
early Chinese literature, literary history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review