Le Roman du pourfendeur de démons. Traduction annotée et commentaires
Abstract
Eliasberg Danielle. Le Roman du pourfendeur de démons. Traduction annotée et commentaires. In: École pratique des hautes études. 4e section, Sciences historiques et philologiques. Annuaire 1974-1975. 1975. pp. 1047-1049.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Berezkin, R. (2013) · Late imperial China · doi:10.1353/late.2013.0008 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Variations on gui and the Trouble with Ghosts in Modern Chinese Fiction
Imbach, J. (2016) · Asiatische Studien – Études Asiatiques · doi:10.1515/asia-2015-1013 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Eliasberg, D.
- Corresponding author
- Eliasberg, Danielle
- Venue
- École pratique des hautes études. 4e section, Sciences historiques et philologiques
- Publisher
- PERSEE Program
- Published
- 1975
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1047-1049
- ISSN
- 0245-9000 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070837998
- Semantic Scholar
- 1fdfe223348d986742572795592943210d988ef6
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- École pratique des hautes études 4e section Sciences historiques et philologiques (publishedVersion)
- Périodiques Scientifiques en Édition Électronique (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Medieval Literature and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Keywords
- Old French romance, medieval French literature, Demon Slayer, literary translation, annotated translation, textual commentary
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
