The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Vingança e temporalidade: os Tupinamba
Abstract
Revenge and time : the Tupinamba. At the heart of Tupinamba society, there is revenge, say the authors. Cannibalism is part of a logic of absolute revenge, where anthropophagie consumption is but the association of all to the process of revenge. Revenge can be exerted beyond the historical dispa rition of cannibalism per se, because it is more fundamental than the latter. It is indeed the guarantee of social memory, articulating the dead of the past to the dead of the future through the living. The authors then sketchily compare this society geared onto temporality with the Gê and Tukano (Vaupés) societies, and end up by a reflection on the place of historicity in this society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There were two wars in the written sources, the one emphasizing European accomplishment, and the other, which was the invisibilized war of revenge between the Tamoio and the Temiminõ, and between the Tamoio and the Tupiniquim, and started long before the Europeans' presence.
“There were two wars in the written sources, the one emphasizing European accomplishment, and the other, which was the invisibilized war of revenge between the Tamoio and the Temiminõ, and between the Tamoio and the Tupiniquim, and started long before the Europeans' presence (Cunha and Castro, 1985).”
From Archaeologies of gender, kinship, and mobility in Southeast Brazil: genealogies of Tupiniquim women and the itinerancy of ceramic practices (2023) · cites this paper as Cunha and Castro, 1985
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Noelli, F. S., Sallum, M., & Peixoto, S. A. (2023) · Journal of Social Archaeology · doi:10.1177/14696053231180273 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Carneiro da Cunha, M., & Viveiros de Castro, E.
- Venue
- Journal de la Société des Américanistes
- Publisher
- PERSEE Program
- Published
- 1985
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 191-208
- ISSN
- 0037-9174
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 0
- Language
- fr
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
