The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New light on Final Pleistocene settlement diversity in the Azraq Basin (Jordan): recent excavations at 'Ayn Qasiyya
Abstract
Les fouilles du site daté de l’Épipaléolithique ancien de ‘ Ayn Qasiyya dans l’oasis d’Azraq (Est de la Jordanie) fournissent des données nouvelles et importantes pour notre compréhension des causes de la sédentarisation, des effets écologiques sur l’évolution culturelle, des pratiques funéraires et des relations sociales en Asie du Sud-Ouest à la fi n du Pléistocène. Cet article présente un résumé du travail sur ce site et il fournit les résultats préliminaires de l’analyse de la faune, des artefacts et des restes humains. En outre, il discute de l’importance de ces résultats dans le contexte de la séquence culturelle locale et régionale à la fi n du Pléistocène. Nos données offrent un aperçu de la relation entre les industries lithiques du Nébékien et du Kébarien. Elles suggèrent que l’environnement local de l’oasis d’Azraq a facilité le début de la pédogénèse vers 21 000-20 000 cal. BP. Enfin, elles confirment la nature éphémère des pratiques funéraires de l’Épipaléolithique ancien.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Azraq Basin is presently the only place where both Kebaran and Nebekian traditions are well documented.
“In fact, the Azraq Basin is presently the only place where both traditions are well documented (Garrard and Byrd, 2013;Richter et al., 2010Richter et al., , 2011a)).”
From Modeling Foraging Ranges and Spatial Organization of Late Pleistocene Hunter gatherers in the Southern Levant - A Least-Cost GIS Approach (2016) · cites this paper as Richter et al., 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Body mass and encephalization in Pleistocene Homo.
Ruff, C. B., Trinkaus, E., & Holliday, T. W. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387173a0 · Cited by 896
Raxter, M. H., Ruff, C. B., Azab, A., Erfan, M., Soliman, M., & El‐Sawaf, A. (2008) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20790 · Cited by 113
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Byrd, B. F., Garrard, A. N., & Brandy, P. (2016) · Quaternary International · doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2015.07.048 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Richter, T., Allcock, S., Jones, M., Maher, L., Martin, L., Stock, J. T., & Thorne, B.
- Venue
- Paléorient
- Publisher
- PERSEE Program
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 49-68
- ISSN
- 0153-9345
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 2
- Language
- fr
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
