Cited by 21Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and HistoryArchaeological and Geological StudiesArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

The Transition from the Chalcolithic to the Early Bronze Age of the Southern Levant in socioeconomic context

Open access
Milevski, Ianir·2013·Paléorient

Abstract

The transition from the Chalcolithic to the Early Bronze Age in the Southern Levant (ca 3800-3600 BC) had multiple aspects. While often the term transition is used to describe material culture remains of both periods, the aim of this paper is to characterize the changes in the socio-economic reality during the two centuries or so during which the transition took place. Degrees of change were uneven and happened in different ways in different regions. Socio-economic systems went from predominantly agropastoral communities during the Chalcolithic, with relatively developed secondary production branches, to an urban revolution towards the end of Early Bronze (EB) I. In spite of continuity in several traditions such as the manufacture of pottery, fl int tools, basalt vessels, changes occurred in both technology and organization of production and distribution. Agricultural and pastoral activities also changed but more slowly. Means of transportation were radically transformed with the domestication of the donkey. Circulation of commodities, albeit in a somewhat limited way, increased from the Chalcolithic to the EB I. Architectural concepts changed from the very beginning of the EB I, while burial practices as well as iconographic expressions related to religious beliefs and society, were drastically altered. This paper explores this transition taking into consideration those socio-economic changes and their probable political and cultural implications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3406/paleo.2013.5495

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The archaeological record is marked by dramatic changes in settlement patterns, large-scale abandonment of sites, many fewer items with symbolic meaning, and shifts in burial practices, including the disappearance of secondary burial in ossuaries.

    “aspects of the archeological record marked by dramatic changes in settlement patterns43, large-scale abandonment of sites52–55, many fewer items with symbolic meaning, and shifts in burial practices, including the disappearance of secondary burial in ossuaries56–59.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milevski, I.
Corresponding author
Milevski, Ianir
Venue
Paléorient
Published
2013
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
193-208
ISSN
0153-9345 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2209985092
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.42
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
Locations
  • Paléorient (publishedVersion)
  • Périodiques Scientifiques en Édition Électronique (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
Chalcolithic, Early Bronze Age, Southern Levant, socio-economic change, urbanization, agropastoralism, secondary production, transportation, commodity circulation, pottery, flint tools, architectural transformation, funerary practices, iconography, political transition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review