La production des normes au sein d'un réseau professionnel : l'exemple d'un groupe d'éleveurs
Open accessAbstract
A partir d'une critique des «évidences» qui commandent la conception dominante des actions de développement agricole et les recherches sur ce thème, l'auteur de l'article entreprend une analyse des processus de transformation des normes en milieu agricole. L'étude de l'activité d'un groupe d'éleveurs, au sein d'un «réseau d' interconnaissance», conduit ainsi fauteur à souligner l'importance de la prise en compte, non seulement des choix techniques matériels mais aussi des façons dont les acteurs eux-mêmes les conçoivent et en débattent.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Darré (1984) succeeded in engaging farmers in peer groups by developing a facilitation method based on the collective resolution of their problems, accompanying the associated production of knowledge and professional norms.
“Darré (1984) succeeded in engaging farmers in peer groups by developing a facilitation method based on the collective resolution of their problems, accompanying the associated production of knowledge and professional norms.”
From A facilitation method to foster collective action in transitions toward sustainable agriculture—a case study (2022) · cites this paper as Darré (1984)
On pp. 142–144, Darré describes local groups of farmers as places where professional knowledge and technical norms are formed and transformed. The passages do not say that he developed a facilitation method, successfully engaged farmers in peer groups, or guided them through collective problem-solving; searches for those activities found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cremilleux, M., Michaud, A., Cayre, P., Martin, B., Rigolot, C., & Michelin, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2023.875820 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Hazard, L., Locqueville, J., & Rey, F. (2022) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-022-00838-9 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Darré, J.-P.
- Corresponding author
- Darré, Jean-Pierre
- Venue
- Sociologie du travail
- Publisher
- PERSEE Program
- Published
- 1984
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 141-156
- ISSN
- 0038-0296 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2795750224
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Sociologie du Travail (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture and Rural Development Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education, sociology, and vocational training
- Keywords
- norm production, professional networks, livestock farmers, agricultural development, technology selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
