Cited by 8Agriculture and Rural Development ResearchSustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

Combining systemic and pragmatic approaches for the holistic diagnosis of a farm in agroecological transition in a health context

Open access
Cremilleux, Maeva, Michaud, Audrey, Cayre, Patrice, Martin, Bruno, Rigolot, Cyrille, Michelin, Yves·2023·Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems

Abstract

Introduction: Today, agriculture and livestock farming are facing environmental, social and health challenges. The agroecological transition is a possible response to these challenges. It requires changes in practices but also an evolution in farmers' ways of thinking and relationships with living things. Some diagnostics of farms, such as the global analysis of farms, behaviors and practices. Methods: We therefore propose a holistic approach combining a global analysis of farms and a pragmatic approach to understand the functioning of agricultural production systems. This pragmatic turn enables to integrate the ways in which the farmer's reality is established, the performance of the system, the associated metrics and the farmer's relationship with life. Results and discussion: Using the example of a farm in transition, we show that it is the combination researcher's stance and allows for a renewed dialogue between research and farmers in the field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fsufs.2023.875820

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The primary goal of farmers in producing their own hay or moving herds to pasture is to provide the best quality fiber for their animals and maintain the health of their grasslands.

    “Indeed, the primary goal of farmers in producing their own hay or moving herds to pasture is to provide the best quality fiber for their animals and maintain the health of their grasslands (Table 3) [27], overcoming potentially lower yields due to high biodiversity of mountain grasslands [25].”

    From Grassland-Based Farming Systems Targeting Agroecology: Which Indicators Should Be Used for On-Farm Assessment? (2025) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Forage and crop system section says that M. Henri uses cutting and rotational grazing to balance forage quality, animal health, and grassland health. The Results section also says that animal care is his main concern and that he tends grassland partly to maintain animal health. These findings concern one farmer; they do not establish that farmers generally have a primary goal of providing the best-quality fiber through haymaking or grazing. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Graham, J. P., Leibler, J. H., Price, L. B., Otte, J. M., Pfeiffer, D. U., Tiensin, T., et al. (2008). The animal-human interface and infectious disease in industrial food animal production : Rethinking biosecurity and biocontainment. Public Health Rep. (Washington, DC: 1974). 123, 282-299. doi: 10.1177/003335490812300309 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cremilleux, M., Michaud, A., Cayre, P., Martin, B., Rigolot, C., & Michelin, Y.
Affiliations
Université Clermont Auvergne (FR)
Venue
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Published
2023-03-01
Volume
7
Pages
875820
ISSN
2571-581X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4322744443
Cited by
8
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-16-IDEX-0001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture and Rural Development Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
agroecological transition, farm diagnosis, holistic approach, pragmatic turn, agricultural production systems, farmer practices, animal husbandry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review