The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Many Plant Species are There, Where are They, and at What Rate are They Going Extinct?
Abstract
How many flowering plant species are there? Where are they? How many are going extinct, and how fast are they doing so? Interesting in themselves, these are questions at the heart of modern conservation biology. Determining the answers will dictate where and how successfully conservation efforts will be allocated. Plants form a large taxonomic sample of biodiversity. They are important in themselves and directly determine the diversity of many other taxonomic groups. Inspired by conversations with Peter Raven, we set out to provide quantitative answers to these questions. We argue that there are 450,000 species, two thirds of which live in the tropics, a third of all species are at risk of extinction, and they are going extinct 1000 to 10,000 times the background rate. In obtaining these results, we point to the critical role of dedicated taxonomic effort and biodiversity monitoring. We will only get a good answer to the age-old question of “how many species are there?” when we understand the population biology and social behavior of taxonomists. That most missing species will be found in biodiversity hotspots reaffirms their place as the foci of extinction for decades to come. Important, but not yet addressed, are future studies of how long plant species take to become extinct in habitat fragments. These will deliver not only better estimates of extinction rates, but also the critical timeframe of how quickly one needs to act to prevent extinctions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35002501 · Cited by 31,710
Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity
Rodrigues, A. S. L., Andelman, S. J., Bakarr, M. I., Boitani, L., Brooks, T. M., Cowling, R. M., Fishpool, L. D. C., da Fonseca, G. A. B., Gaston, K. J., Hoffmann, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02422 · Cited by 1,525
Rates of species loss from Amazonian forest fragments
Ferraz, G., Russell, G. J., Stouffer, P. C., Bierregaard, R. O., Pimm, S. L., & Lovejoy, T. E. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2336195100 · Cited by 350
Self-citation
Cited by
The number of known plants species in the world and its annual increase
CHRISTENHUSZ, M. J. M., & BYNG, J. W. (2016) · Phytotaxa · doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.261.3.1 · Cited by 2,113
An integrated assessment of the vascular plant species of the Americas
Ulloa Ulloa, C., Acevedo-Rodríguez, P., Beck, S., Belgrano, M. J., Bernal, R., Berry, P. E., Brako, L., Celis, M., Davidse, G., Forzza, R. C., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao0398 · Cited by 486
Fungal endophytes: modifiers of plant disease
Busby, P. E., Ridout, M., & Newcombe, G. (2016) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-015-0412-0 · Cited by 445
A paradigm shift in our view of species drives current trends in biological classification
Padial, J. M., & De la Riva, I. (2021) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12676 · Cited by 85
Accuracy of ancestral state reconstruction for non-neutral traits
Holland, B. R., Ketelaar-Jones, S., O’Mara, A. R., Woodhams, M. D., & Jordan, G. J. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-64647-4 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Pimm, S. L., & Joppa, L. N.
- Venue
- Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden
- Publisher
- Missouri Botanical Garden Press
- Published
- 2015-03-16
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 170-176
- ISSN
- 0026-6493 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-4372
- OpenAlex
- W1988808143
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Many Plant Species are There, Where are They, and at What Rate are They Going Extinct? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3417/2012018
- The paper
- Pimm, S. L., & Joppa, L. N. (2015). How Many Plant Species are There, Where are They, and at What Rate are They Going Extinct? Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. https://doi.org/10.3417/2012018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.