Cited by 1,525Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesLand Use and Ecosystem Services

Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity

Rodrigues, Ana S. L., Andelman, Sandy J., Bakarr, Mohamed I., Boitani, Luigi, Brooks, Thomas M., Cowling, Richard M., Fishpool, Lincoln D. C., da Fonseca, Gustavo A. B. +13 more·2004·Nature

Abstract

The Fifth World Parks Congress in Durban, South Africa, announced in September 2003 that the global network of protected areas now covers 11.5% of the planet's land surface. This surpasses the 10% target proposed a decade earlier, at the Caracas Congress, for 9 out of 14 major terrestrial biomes. Such uniform targets based on percentage of area have become deeply embedded into national and international conservation planning. Although politically expedient, the scientific basis and conservation value of these targets have been questioned. In practice, however, little is known of how to set appropriate targets, or of the extent to which the current global protected area network fulfils its goal of protecting biodiversity. Here, we combine five global data sets on the distribution of species and protected areas to provide the first global gap analysis assessing the effectiveness of protected areas in representing species diversity. We show that the global network is far from complete, and demonstrate the inadequacy of uniform--that is, 'one size fits all'--conservation targets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature02422

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Protected areas offer inadequate coverage of the ranges of threatened birds, mammals, amphibians and reptiles at continental and global scales.

    “However, analysis of threatened birds, mammals, amphibians and reptiles at both continental and global scales suggests that protected areas offer inadequate coverage of the ranges of these groups (De Klerk et al., ; Rodrigues et al., ; Beresford et al., a,b; Butchart et al., ).”

    From A mix of community-based conservation and protected forests is needed for the survival of the Endangered pygmy hippopotamus<i>Choeropsis liberiensis</i> (2017) · cites this paper as Rodrigues et al., 2004

    The Results (p. 3) report that 20% of threatened species analysed had no overlap with a protected area, supporting inadequate coverage at the global scale. The Data section (p. 4) shows that the reptile data cover only freshwater turtles and tortoises, and the paper describes a global analysis rather than a continental-scale one. This source therefore does not support the claim's full taxonomic and geographic scope. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [1]Chape, S., Fish, L., Fox, P . &amp; Spalding, M. United Nations List of Protected Areas (IUCN/UNEP, Gland, Switzerland/Cambridge, UK, 2003).
  2. [3]Kamden-Toham, A. et al. Forest conservation in the Congo Basin. Science 299, 346 (2003).
  3. [8]Lacher, T. E. Jr in GIS Methodologies for Developing Conservation Strategies (eds Savitsky, B. G. &amp; Lacher, T. E. Jr) 199-209 (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1998).
  4. [15]The World Conservation Union, Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories (IUCN CNPPA/WCMC, Gland, Switzerland/Cambridge, UK, 1994).
  5. [16]Stattersfield, A. J., Crosby, M. J., Long, A. J. &amp; Wege, D. C. Endemic Bird Areas of the World-Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation (BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK, 1998).
  6. [17]BirdLife International. Threatened Birds of the World (Lynx Edicions/BirdLife International, Barcelona/Cambridge, UK, 2000).
  7. [23]Green, M. J. B. &amp; Paine, J. State of the World's Protected Areas at the End of the Twentieth Century (WCMC, Cambridge, UK, 1997).
  8. [26]Cowling, R. M. &amp; Pressey, R. L. Rapid plant diversification: planning for an evolutionary future. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5452-5457 (2001).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodrigues, A. S. L., Andelman, S. J., Bakarr, M. I., Boitani, L., Brooks, T. M., Cowling, R. M., Fishpool, L. D. C., da Fonseca, G. A. B., Gaston, K. J., Hoffmann, M., Long, J. S., Marquet, P. A., Pilgrim, J. D., Pressey, R. L., Schipper, J., Sechrest, W., Stuart, S. N., Underhill, L. G., Waller, R. W., Watts, M. E. J., & Yan, X.
Affiliations
  • Conservation International (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • World Agroforestry Centre (KE)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
  • BirdLife international (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
  • University of Idaho (US)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Rodrigues, Ana S. L.
Venue
Nature
Published
2004-04
Volume
428
Issue
6983
Pages
640-643
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2103819062
Cited by
1,525
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 80 · 2017: 97 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 85 · 2013: 74 · 2012: 77
FWCI
51.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • EPubDev Repository (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
protected area network, biodiversity conservation targets, terrestrial biomes, conservation effectiveness
MeSH terms
Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Geography, International Cooperation, Species Specificity, Time Factors, Biodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review