Cited by 27Recommender Systems and TechniquesOnline Learning and AnalyticsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Recommendation Systems on E-Learning and Social Learning: A Systematic Review

Open access
Souabi, Sonia, Retbi, Asmaâ, Khalidi Idrissi, Mohammed Khalidi Idrissi, Bennani, Samir·2021·Electronic Journal of e-Learning

Abstract

E-learning is renowned as one of the highly effective modalities of learning. Social learning, in turn, is considered to be of major importance as it promotes collaboration between learners. For properly managing learning resources, recommender systems have been implemented in e-learning to enhance learners' experience. Whilst recommender systems are of widespread concern in online learning, it is still unclear to educators how recommender systems can improve the learning process and have a positive impact on learning. This paper seeks to provide an overview of the recommender systems proposed in e-learning between 2007 and the first part of 2021. Out of 100 initially identified publications for the period between 2007 and the first part of 2021, 51 articles were included for final synthesis, according to specific criteria. The descriptive results show that most of the disciplines involved in educational recommender systems papers have approached e-learning in a general way without putting as much emphasis on social learning, and that recommender systems based on explicit feedbacks and ratings were the most frequently used in empirical studies. The synthesis of results presents several recommender systems types in e-learning: (1) Content-based recommender systems, (2) Collaborative-filtering recommender systems, (3) Hybrid recommender systems and (4) Recommender systems based on supervised and unsupervised algorithms. The conclusions reflect on the almost lack of critical reflection on the importance of addressing recommender systems in social learning and social educational networks in particular, especially as social learning has particular requirements, the weak databases size used in some research work, the importance of acknowledging the strengths and weaknesses of each type of recommender system in an educational context and the need for further exploration of implicit feedbacks more than explicit learners’ feedbacks for more accurate recommendations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.34190/ejel.19.5.2482

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Agbonifo, O. C. and Akinsete, M., 2020. Development of an ontology-based personalised e-learning recommender system. International Journal of Computer (IJC), 38(1), pp. 102-112.
  2. Bourkoukou, O., Bachari, E.E., 2018. Toward a hybrid recommender system for e-learning personalization based on data mining technique. International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 2(4), pp.271-278.
  3. Khairil Imran, Ghauth; Nor Aniza, Abdullah, 2011. The effect of incorporating good learners' ratings in e-learning content- based recommender system. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), pp. 248-257.
  4. Khan, A., Egbue, O., Palkie, B., Madden, J., 2017. Active learning: engaging students to maximize learning in an online course. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 15(2), p107-115.
  5. Sharma, S., Mahajan, A., 2017. A collaborative filtering recommender system for github, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Engineering Research (IJETER), 5(8), pp. 57-62
  6. Soude Fazeli, Babak Loni, Hendrik Drachsler and Peter B. Sloep, 2014. Which recommender system can best fit social learning platforms?, In: C., Rensing, S. de Freitas, T. Ley, P.J. Muñoz-Merino (Eds.), Open learning and teaching in educational communities. Cham: Springer, pp. 84-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11200-8_7 · DOI
  7. Verlani Timm Hinz; Marcelo Soares Pimenta, 2018. Integrating reputation to recommendation techniques in an e-learning environment. 17th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), Olhao: IEEE, 2018, pp. 1-6.
  8. Yanes, N., Mostafa, A. M., Ezz, M.and Almuayqil, S. N., 2020. A machine learning-based recommender system for improving students learning experiences. IEEE Access, 8, pp. 201218-201235. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3036336 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Souabi, S., Retbi, A., Khalidi Idrissi, M. K. I., & Bennani, S.
Affiliations
Mohammed V University (MA)
Corresponding author
Souabi, Sonia
Venue
Electronic Journal of e-Learning
Published
2021-11-12
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
pp432-451
ISSN
1479-4403 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3213795104
Cited by
27
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The Electronic Journal of e-Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
recommender systems, online learning, social learning, collaborative filtering, content-based recommendation, hybrid recommendation, implicit feedback, explicit feedback, learning resources, student experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review