Cited by 31Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesTeam Dynamics and PerformanceOutsourcing and Supply Chain Management

Practical experience of virtual team software development

Open access
Casey, Valentine, Richardson, Ita·2004·University of Limerick

Abstract

Given the current popularity of Global Software Development (GSD) increasing numbers of organisations are taking the opportunity offered to set up virtual software teams. This approach allows companies to partner experienced engineers located in high cost economic areas with less experienced team members based in low cost centres allowing both locations to be leveraged to their best advantage. A number of different approaches are currently being undertaken. Some organisations have set up subsidiaries in low cost economies and are developing virtual teams in this environment. Others are partnering with third party outsourcing organisations. The focus of this research is an Irish based company partnered with an organisation located in the US to develop and maintain bespoke financial software. A number of virtual teams were established, each team had members based in the US and Ireland. Given the locations involved it was initially believed that the organisations were culturally near shore. While that proved correct to a point, it soon became clear that communication, motivation and cultural differences existed and needed to be addressed. It was also realised that a new approach to process development and improvement had to be undertaken to ensure the successful development and operation of these virtual teams. Both organisations had good single site development and maintenance processes, but they proved inadequate for a multi-site GSD environment and needed to be extensively re…

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.34961/530

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High temporal distance reduces the number of overlapping work hours between collaboration sites.

    “One key disadvantage to high temporal distance is the reduced number of overlapping work hours between collaboration sites [11,33,132].”
  • Language challenges occur even among native speakers due to dialects and accents.

    “This challenge is not just a matter of different languages, even native speakers of one language may have problems because of differences in dialects and local accents [33].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Casey, V., & Richardson, I.
Venue
University of Limerick
Publisher
University of Limerick
Published
2004
OpenAlex
W2241110431
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.74
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
Keywords
distributed software development, software outsourcing, intercultural communication, team motivation, process improvement, software maintenance, financial software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review