Practical experience of virtual team software development
Open accessAbstract
Given the current popularity of Global Software Development (GSD) increasing numbers of organisations are taking the opportunity offered to set up virtual software teams. This approach allows companies to partner experienced engineers located in high cost economic areas with less experienced team members based in low cost centres allowing both locations to be leveraged to their best advantage. A number of different approaches are currently being undertaken. Some organisations have set up subsidiaries in low cost economies and are developing virtual teams in this environment. Others are partnering with third party outsourcing organisations. The focus of this research is an Irish based company partnered with an organisation located in the US to develop and maintain bespoke financial software. A number of virtual teams were established, each team had members based in the US and Ireland. Given the locations involved it was initially believed that the organisations were culturally near shore. While that proved correct to a point, it soon became clear that communication, motivation and cultural differences existed and needed to be addressed. It was also realised that a new approach to process development and improvement had to be undertaken to ensure the successful development and operation of these virtual teams. Both organisations had good single site development and maintenance processes, but they proved inadequate for a multi-site GSD environment and needed to be extensively re…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
High temporal distance reduces the number of overlapping work hours between collaboration sites.
“One key disadvantage to high temporal distance is the reduced number of overlapping work hours between collaboration sites [11,33,132].”
From Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review (2020) · cites this paper as [33]
Language challenges occur even among native speakers due to dialects and accents.
“This challenge is not just a matter of different languages, even native speakers of one language may have problems because of differences in dialects and local accents [33].”
From Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review (2020) · cites this paper as [33]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review
Morrison-Smith, S., & Ruiz, J. (2020) · SN Applied Sciences · doi:10.1007/s42452-020-2801-5 · Cited by 633 · see citing works
- Authors
- Casey, V., & Richardson, I.
- ORCID
- Richardson, Ita
- Venue
- University of Limerick
- Publisher
- University of Limerick
- Published
- 2004
- DOI
- 10.34961/530
- OpenAlex
- W2241110431
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.74
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
- Keywords
- distributed software development, software outsourcing, intercultural communication, team motivation, process improvement, software maintenance, financial software
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review