Growth in floor area: the blind spot in cutting carbon
Open accessAbstract
While most efforts to combat climate change are focussed on energy efficiency and substitution of fossil fuels, growth in the built environment remains largely unquestioned. Given the current climate emergency and increasing scarcity of global resources, it is imperative that we address this “blind spot” by finding ways to support required services with less resource consumption. There is now long overdue recognition to greenhouse gas emissions “embodied” in the production of building materials and construction, and its importance in reaching targets of net zero carbon by 2050. However, there is a widespread belief that we can continue to “build big”, provided we incorporate energy saving measures and select “low carbon materials” – ignoring the fact that excessive volume and area of buildings may outweigh any carbon savings. This is especially the case with commercial real estate. As the inception and planning phases of projects offer most potential for reduction in both operational and embodied carbon, we must turn our attention to previously overlooked options such as “build nothing” or “build less”. This involves challenging the root cause of the need, exploring alternative approaches to meet desired outcomes, and maximising the use of existing assets. If new build is required, this should be designed for adaptability, with increased stewardship, so the building stock of the future will be a more valuable and useable resource. This points to the need for increased understanding and application of the principles of strategic asset management, hitherto largely ignored in sustainability circles, which emphasize a close alignment of assets with the services they support. Arguably, as the built environment consumes more material resources and energy than any other sector, its future configuration may be critical to the future of people and the planet. In this regard, this paper seeks to break new ground for deeper exploration.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For public and private building owners, achieving the greatest carbon benefit from preserved buildings would depend on a commitment to strategic asset management.
“For public and private building owners, this would depend on a commitment to strategic asset management (Ness 2020).”
From Making embodied carbon mainstream: a framework for cities to leverage waste, equity, and preservation policy to reduce embodied emissions in buildings (2023) · cites this paper as Ness 2020
Limiting the construction of new floor area is virtually guaranteed to avoid emissions.
“Limiting the construction of new floor area is virtually guaranteed to avoid emissions (Ness 2020;Seton et al. 2019), but demand for new space will persist.”
From Making embodied carbon mainstream: a framework for cities to leverage waste, equity, and preservation policy to reduce embodied emissions in buildings (2023) · cites this paper as Ness 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
On the circular bioeconomy and decoupling: implications for sustainable growth
Giampietro, M. (2019) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.001 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Rethinking Climate and Energy Policies
(2016) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-38807-6 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Allwood J: Squaring the circular economy: the role of recycling within a hierarchy of material management strategies. Chapter 30 in: Worrell E, and M Reuter (eds), Handbook of recycling: state of the art for practitioners, analysts, and scientists. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2014; 445-477. Publisher Full Text References · DOI
- Fotopoulos T: Is degrowth compatible with a market economy?. The International Journal of Inclusive Democracy. 3 (1). Reference Source
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teicher, H. M. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-023-00836-7 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ness, D.
- Affiliations
- University of South Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Ness, David
- ORCID
- Ness, David
- Venue
- Emerald Open Research
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2020-04-22
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2-2
- ISSN
- 2631-3952 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3001871445
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Emerald Open Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Real estate and construction management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Keywords
- embodied carbon, built environment, commercial real estate, net zero carbon, building materials, construction emissions, adaptive reuse, strategic asset management, building stock, resource consumption, climate change mitigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review