Cited by 11Sustainable Building Design and AssessmentReal estate and construction managementEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

Growth in floor area: the blind spot in cutting carbon

Open access
Ness, David·2023·Emerald Open Research

Abstract

While most efforts to combat climate change are focussed on energy efficiency and substitution of fossil fuels, growth in the built environment remains largely unquestioned. Given the current climate emergency and increasing scarcity of global resources, it is imperative that we address this “blind spot” by finding ways to support required services with less resource consumption. There is now long overdue recognition to greenhouse gas emissions “embodied” in the production of building materials and construction, and its importance in reaching targets of net zero carbon by 2050. However, there is a widespread belief that we can continue to “build big”, provided we incorporate energy saving measures and select “low carbon materials” – ignoring the fact that excessive volume and area of buildings may outweigh any carbon savings. This is especially the case with commercial real estate. As the inception and planning phases of projects offer most potential for reduction in both operational and embodied carbon, we must turn our attention to previously overlooked options such as “build nothing” or “build less”. This involves challenging the root cause of the need, exploring alternative approaches to meet desired outcomes, and maximising the use of existing assets. If new build is required, this should be designed for adaptability, with increased stewardship, so the building stock of the future will be a more valuable and useable resource. This points to the need for increased understanding and application of the principles of strategic asset management, hitherto largely ignored in sustainability circles, which emphasize a close alignment of assets with the services they support. Arguably, as the built environment consumes more material resources and energy than any other sector, its future configuration may be critical to the future of people and the planet. In this regard, this paper seeks to break new ground for deeper exploration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/eor-05-2023-0002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Allwood J: Squaring the circular economy: the role of recycling within a hierarchy of material management strategies. Chapter 30 in: Worrell E, and M Reuter (eds), Handbook of recycling: state of the art for practitioners, analysts, and scientists. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2014; 445-477. Publisher Full Text References · DOI
  2. Fotopoulos T: Is degrowth compatible with a market economy?. The International Journal of Inclusive Democracy. 3 (1). Reference Source

Authors
Ness, D.
Affiliations
University of South Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Ness, David
Venue
Emerald Open Research
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2020-04-22
Volume
1
Issue
5
Pages
2-2
ISSN
2631-3952 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3001871445
Cited by
11
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Emerald Open Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Real estate and construction management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
embodied carbon, built environment, commercial real estate, net zero carbon, building materials, construction emissions, adaptive reuse, strategic asset management, building stock, resource consumption, climate change mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review