The DOI matches its Crossref record.
KETERSEDIAAN DATA DALAM MENDUKUNG PEMANTAUAN DAN EVALUASI SMART CITY MATURITY (STUDI KASUS KOTA YOGYAKARTA)
Open accessAbstract
The development of smart cities that have become a trend throughout the world, including Indonesia, requires a guideline in city development. Yogyakarta City is a city that has developed a smart city since the early 2000s which began with the existence of an information and complaint service unit (UPIK) as part of the implementation of open government. Active people in Yogyakarta City who access Jogja Smart Services (JSS) are only 6.5% of the total population, so it shows that human relations in the JSS application have not been carried out properly. The government through SNI 37122:2019 applies variables and indicators as well as data needs needed to assess the level achievement of smart cities. This paper aims to explain the availability of data and identify data that is not available in Yogyakarta City based on SNI 37122:2019 also how strategies to complete the data. The method used in this study uses a qualitative approach. The availability of data in the government of Yogyakarta consists of 118 data, data found elsewhere other than the city government is 13% and no data anywhere is 25 data. The strategy to enrich the data is through proper policies, technology infrastructure, and application development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Yogyakarta's adherence to international technical standards demonstrates a commitment to global best practices.
“Yogyakarta’s adherence to international technical standards (Colleena and Djunaedi, 2023) demonstrates a commitment to global best practices”
From Smart city governance and interoperability: enhancing human security in Yogyakarta and Makassar, Indonesia (2025) · cites this paper as Colleena and Djunaedi, 2023
The Introduction and Methods use ISO 37122:2019 and its Indonesian adoption, SNI 37122:2019, as the framework for assessing Yogyakarta’s smart-city data. They do not establish that Yogyakarta itself adheres to the standard. The Conclusion says the data are not yet sufficient for optimal monitoring and evaluation against it; the claim about commitment to global best practices is the citing author’s inference. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Caird, S. P., & Hallett, S. H. (2019). Towards evaluation design for smart city development. Journal of Urban Design, 24(2), 188-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1469402 · DOI
- Faidati, N., & Khozin, M. (2018). Analisa Strategi Pengembangan Kota Pintar (Smart City): Studi Kasus Kota Yogyakarta. 3(2), 16-27. https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.v3i2.1037 · DOI
- Huovila, A., Bosch, P., & Airaksinen, M. (2019). Comparative analysis of standardized indicators for Smart sustainable cities: What indicators and standards to use and when? Cities, 89, 141-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.029 · DOI
- Korachi, Z., & Bounabat, B. (2018). Data driven maturity model for assessing smart cities. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 140-147. https://doi.org/10.1145/3289100.3289123 · DOI
- Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 282-291. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037602 · DOI
- Novriando, A., Purnomo, P., & Salsabila, L. (2020). Efektivitas "Jogja Smart Service" Terhadap Pelayanan Publik di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 13(2), 68-75.
- Rijal Fadli, M. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. 21(1), 33-54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1 · DOI
- Sharifi, A. (2020). A typology of smart city assessment tools and indicator sets. Sustainable Cities and Society, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101936 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hardi, R., Nurmandi, A., Purwaningsih, T., & Manaf, H. A. (2025) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2025.1553177 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Colleena, M., & Djunaedi, A.
- Affiliations
- Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
- ORCID
- Djunaedi, Achmad
- Venue
- Jurnal Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Kebijakan
- Publisher
- Institut Teknologi Sumatra
- Published
- 2023-12-06
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 227
- ISSN
- 2775-0566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4400178320
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Jurnal Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Kebijakan (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Smart Cities and Technologies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration in Developing Nations
- Keywords
- data availability, data gaps, smart city indicators, Yogyakarta City, open government, municipal data management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
