Cited by 295Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceResearch, Science, and AcademiaDesign Education and Practice

Creativity in the R&D Laboratory

Open access
Amabile, Teresa, Gryskiewicz, Stanely·1987

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.35613/ccl.1987.1088

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  2. Andrews, F. M. (1975). Social and psychological factors which influence the creative pro- cess. In I. A. Taylor and J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity. Chicago: Aldine.
  3. Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. L. (1985). Proactive feedback seeking: The instrumental use of the information environment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58, 67-80.
  4. Baran, S., Zandan, P., & Vanston, J. H. (1986, January-February). How effectively are we managing innovation? Research Management, pp. 23-25.
  5. Daft, R. L., & Becker, S. W. (1978). Innovation in organizations. New York: Elsevier North- Holland, Inc.
  6. Faas, F. A. M. J. (1985). How to solve communication problems on the R&D interface. Journal of Management Studies, 22, 83-102.
  7. Pelz, D. C., & Andrews, F. M. (1966). Scientists in organizations. New York: Wiley.
  8. Smeltz, W., & Cross, B. (1984). Toward a profile of the creative R&D professional. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-31, 22-25.
  9. Steiner, G. A. (1965). The creative organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  10. Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbeck, J. (1973). Innovations and organizations. London: Wiley.

Cited by

Authors
Amabile, T., & Gryskiewicz, S.
Affiliations
Brandeis University (US)
Published
1987
OpenAlex
W82123943
Cited by
295
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
Keywords
creativity, research and development, innovation, R&D laboratories

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review