Cited by 36Patient Satisfaction in HealthcarePatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization

The perioperative patient experience of hand and wrist surgical patients: An exploratory study using patient journey mapping

Open access
de Ridder, Else F., Dekkers, Tessa, Porsius, Jarry T, Kraan, Gerald, Melles, Marijke·2018·Patient Experience Journal

Abstract

Patient-centred care is becoming more important in healthcare. The success of patient-centred care can be assessed by exploring the patient experience through a patient journey map. As the number of outpatient surgeries is increasing, it is important to reveal the specific characteristics of this type of surgery. The perioperative patient experience is considered very important for outpatient surgery, because all perioperative activities are condensed in one day. To investigate this experience, we performed a case study of hand and wrist surgery. Six teams of two industrial design engineering students interviewed 40 patients in total in two private and two public hospitals in the Netherlands. All teams created a patient journey map, describing the patient experience. These maps were analysed by the authors to identify common themes among the six journeys. Four time-independent themes and four time-dependent themes were identified. Insecurity, reassurance by staff, loneliness, and lack of information were associated with the whole patient experience. Before surgery, lack of control was the most prominent experience. During surgery, acceptance and curiosity were present. After surgery, relief was the dominant experience. No significant differences between the public and private hospitals were discovered. Several suggestions are given on how to facilitate positive experiences and how to resolve negative experiences in outpatient surgery. These include suggestions for hospital policy and design interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.35680/2372-0247.1273

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Wolf JA, Niederhauser V, Marshburn D, Lavela SL. Defining patient experience. Patient Exp J. 2014;1(1):7-19.
  2. Costa MJ. The Lived Perioperative Patient Experience of Ambulatory Surgery Patients. AORN J. 2001;74(6):874-881.
  3. Timmins F, McCabe C. Day Surgery: Contemporary Approaches to Nursing Care. John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
  4. Chung KC. Hand and Wrist Surgery. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012.
  5. Tongue JR, Epps HR, Forese LL. Communication skills for patient-centered care: research-based, easily learned techniques for medical interviews that benefit orthopaedic surgeons and their patients. JBJS. 2005;87(3):652-658

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Ridder, E. F., Dekkers, T., Porsius, J. T., Kraan, G., & Melles, M.
Affiliations
  • Delft University of Technology, Delft
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
Venue
Patient Experience Journal
Published
2018-11-06
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
97-107
ISSN
2372-0247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2900364894
Cited by
36
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patient Experience Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Keywords
hand and wrist surgery, outpatient surgery, patient journey mapping, patient-centered care, lack of information, loneliness, lack of control, public vs private hospitals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review