Cited by 3AI in cancer detectionCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Transforming Dermatopathology with Diagnosis and Predictive Analytics

Open access
Flores, Justin, Misra, Radhika, Shah, Bijoy, Williams, Yazmin, Haghighat, Bardya, Miranda, Genessiss, Jani, Preet, Frasier, Kelly·2025·Dermis.

Abstract

Dermis is an independent open-access Dermatology journal dedicated to dermatology research professionals. It is a leading peer-reviewed journal that publishes new and significant research articles in the field of dermatology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.35702/derm.10029

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Together, these metrics ensure that AI systems are accurate and generalizable for integration into dermatopathology workflow.

    “Together, these metrics ensure that AI systems are accurate and generalizable for integration into dermatopathology workflow [72]; however, discrimination metrics alone may not fully reflect clinical utility.”

    From Artificial Intelligence in Dermatopathology: An Update and Review of the Current Literature (2026) · cites this paper as [72]

    The Introduction’s performance-metrics discussion links diagnostic metrics to accuracy and a role in clinical practice. But the Introduction also says dataset bias remains a challenge and rigorous validation across diverse populations is needed; it does not say the metrics themselves ensure generalizability or readiness for workflow integration. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Federated learning allows AI models to be trained across institutions without transferring patient data.

    “Federated learning allows AI models to be trained across institutions without transferring patient data [72].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Young AT, Xiong M, Pfau J, Keiser MJ, Wei ML. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology: A Primer. J Invest Dermatol. 140(8):1504-1512.
  2. Duschner N, Baguer DO, Schmidt M, Griewank KG, Hadaschik E, Hetzer S, et al. (2023). Applying an artificial intelligence deep learning approach to routine dermatopathological diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 21(11):1329-1337.
  3. Wells A, Patel S, Lee JB, Motaparthi K. (2021). Artificial intelligence in dermatopathology: Diagnosis, education, and research. J Cutan Pathol. 48(8):1061-1068.
  4. Cazzato G, Massaro A, Colagrande A, Trilli I, Ingravallo G, Casatta N, et al. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Applied to a First Screening of Naevoid Melanoma: A New Use of Fast Random Forest Algorithm in Dermatopathology. Curr Oncol. 30(7):6066-6078.
  5. Witkowski AM, Burshtein J, Christopher M, Cockerell C, Correa L, Cotter D, et al. (2024). Clinical Utility of a Digital Dermoscopy Image-Based Artificial Intelligence Device in the Diagnosis and Management of Skin Cancer by Dermatologists. Cancers (Basel). 16(21):3592.
  6. Cazzato G, Rongioletti F. (2024). Artificial intelligence in dermatopathology: Updates, strengths, and challenges. Clin Dermatol. 42(5):437-442.
  7. Cazzato G, Colagrande A, Cimmino A, Arezzo F, Loizzi V, Caporusso C, et al. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Dermatopathology: New Insights and Perspectives. Dermatopathology (Basel). 8(3):418-425.
  8. Das K, Cockerell CJ, Patil A, Pietkiewicz P, Giulini M, Grabbe S, Goldust M. (2021). Machine Learning and Its Application in Skin Cancer. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 18(24):13409.
  9. Maleki Varnosfaderani S, Forouzanfar M. (2024). The Role of AI in Hospitals and Clinics: Transforming Healthcare in the 21st Century. Bioengineering (Basel). 11(4):337.
  10. Cui M, Zhang DY. (2021). Artificial intelligence and computational pathology. Lab Invest. 101(4):412-422.
  11. Xu C, Jackson SA. (2019). Machine learning and complex biological data. Genome Biol. 20(1):76.
  12. Valenti F, Falcone I, Ungania S, Desiderio F, Giacomini P, Bazzichetto C, et al. (2021). Precision Medicine and Melanoma: Multi-Omics Approaches to Monitoring the Immunotherapy Response. Int J Mol Sci. 22(8):3837.
  13. Zhang B, Wang Z, Gao J, Rutjes C, Nufer K, Tao D, et al. (2021). Short-Term Lesion Change Detection for Melanoma Screening With Novel Siamese Neural Network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 40(3):840-851.
  14. Kalidindi S. (2024). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Melanoma. Cureus. 16(9):e69818.
  15. Ibrahim A, Jahanifar M, Wahab N, Toss MS, Makhlouf S, Atallah N, et al. (2024). Artificial Intelligence-Based Mitosis Scoring in Breast Cancer: Clinical Application. Mod Pathol. 37(3):100416.
  16. Durkee MS, Abraham R, Clark MR, Giger ML. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Cellular Segmentation in Tissue Microscopy Images. Am J Pathol. 191(10):1693-1701.
  17. Ivanova M, Pescia C, Trapani D, Venetis K, Frascarelli C, Mane E, et al. (2024). Early Breast Cancer Risk Assessment: Integrating Histopathology with Artificial Intelligence. Cancers (Basel). 16(11):1981.
  18. Nedungadi P, Jayakumar A, Raman R. (2017). Personalized Health Monitoring System for Managing Well-Being in Rural Areas. J Med Syst. 42(1):22.
  19. Rezk E, Eltorki M, El-Dakhakhni W. (2022). Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Improve the Diversity of Dermatological Skin Color Pathology: Protocol for an Algorithm Development and Validation Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 11(3):e34896.
  20. Khatun N, Spinelli G, Colecchia F. (2024). Technology innovation to reduce health inequality in skin diagnosis and to improve patient outcomes for people of color: a thematic literature review and future research agenda. Front Artif Intell. 7:1394386.
  21. Mirakhori F, Niazi SK. Harnessing the AI/ML in Drug and Biological Products Discovery and Development: The Regulatory Perspective. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Jan 3;18(1):47.
  22. Laï MC, Brian M, Mamzer MF. (2020). Perceptions of artificial intelligence in healthcare: findings from a qualitative survey study among actors in France. J Transl Med. 18(1):14.
  23. McKay F, Williams BJ, Prestwich G, Bansal D, Hallowell N, Treanor D. (2022). The ethical challenges of artificial intelligence-driven digital pathology. J Pathol Clin Res. 8(3):209-216.
  24. Chauhan C, Gullapalli RR. Ethics of AI in Pathology: Current Paradigms and Emerging Issues. Am J Pathol. 2021 Oct;191(10):1673-1683.
  25. Chen SB, Novoa RA. (2022). Artificial intelligence for dermatopathology: Current trends and the road ahead. Semin Diagn Pathol. 39(4):298-304.
  26. Abgrall G, Holder AL, Chelly Dagdia Z, Zeitouni K, Monnet X. (2024). Should AI models be explainable to clinicians? Crit Care. 28(1):301.
  27. Metta C, Beretta A, Pellungrini R, Rinzivillo S, Giannotti F. (2024). Towards Transparent Healthcare: Advancing Local Explanation Methods in Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Bioengineering (Basel). 11(4):369.
  28. Eapen BR. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology: A Practical Introduction to a Paradigm Shift. Indian Dermatol Online J. 11(6):881-889.
  29. Huo X, Ong KH, Lau KW, Gole L, Young DM, Tan CL, et al. (2024). A comprehensive AI model development framework for consistent Gleason grading. Commun Med (Lond). 4(1):84.
  30. Pantanowitz L, Hanna M, Pantanowitz J, Lennerz J, Henricks WH, Shen P, et al. (2024). Regulatory Aspects of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Mod Pathol. 37(12):100609.
  31. Hammad M, Pławiak P, ElAffendi M, El-Latif AAA, Latif AAA. (2023). Enhanced Deep Learning Approach for Accurate Eczema and Psoriasis Skin Detection. Sensors (Basel). 23(16):7295.
  32. Juyal S, Sharma S, Shukla AS. (2021). Smart skin health monitoring using AI-enabled cloud-based IoT. Materials Today: Proceedings. 46(20):10539-10545.
  33. Kakish EK, AlSamhori JF, Ramirez Fajardo AN, Qaqish LN, Jaber LA, Abujudeh R, et al. (2025). Transforming Dermatopathology With AI: Addressing Bias, Enhancing Interpretability, and Shaping Future Diagnostics. Dermatological Reviews. 6(1):e70018.
  34. Zehra T, Marino J, Wang W, Frantsuzov G, Nadeem S. (2024). Rethinking Histology Slide Digitization Workflows for Low-Resource Settings. ArXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08169 · arXiv
  35. Kose K, Rotemberg V. (2024). The Promise and Drawbacks of Federated Learning for Dermatology AI. JAMA Dermatol. 160(3):269-270.
  36. Haggenmüller S, Schmitt M, Krieghoff-Henning E, Hekler A, Maron RC, Wies C, et al. (2024). Federated Learning for Decentralized Artificial Intelligence in Melanoma Diagnostics. JAMA Dermatol. 160(3):303-311.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flores, J., Misra, R., Shah, B., Williams, Y., Haghighat, B., Miranda, G., Jani, P., & Frasier, K.
Venue
Dermis.
Published
2025-10-28
Volume
5
Issue
1
ISSN
2998-2502 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410375324
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Dermis. (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence, machine learning, dermatopathology, dermatological diagnosis, predictive analytics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review