Cited by 15Artificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningAdult and Continuing Education Topics

Bridging Resource Gaps in Adult Education: The Role of Generative AI

Open access
Cacicio, Sarah, Riggs, Rachel·2023·Adult Literacy Education: The International Journal of Literacy, Language, and Numeracy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.35847/scacicio.rriggs.5.3.80

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cacicio, S., & Riggs, R.
Venue
Adult Literacy Education: The International Journal of Literacy, Language, and Numeracy
Published
2023-10-02
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
80-86
ISSN
2642-3669 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387265713
Cited by
15
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
ADULT LITERACY EDUCATION THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LITERACY LANGUAGE AND NUMERACY (publishedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
Keywords
generative AI, adult education, resource gaps, adult literacy, educational technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review