Cited by 16Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchAdvancements in Battery MaterialsReliability and Maintenance Optimization

Guidelines for the Characterization of the Internal Impedance of Lithium-Ion Batteries in PHM Algorithms

Open access
Pérez, Aramis, Benavides, Matias, Rozas, Heraldo, Seria, Sebastián, Orchard, Marcos·2020·International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management

Abstract

This article aims to describe the most important aspects to consider when using the concept of internal impedance in algorithms that focus on characterizing the degradation of lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries. The first part of the article provides a literature review that will help the reader understand the concept of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and how Li-ion batteries can be represented through electrochemical or empirical models, in order to interpret the outcome of typical discharge and/or degradation tests on Li-ion batteries. The second part of the manuscript shows the obtained results of an accelerated degradation experiment performed under controlled conditions on a Li-ion cell. Results show that changes observed on the EIS test can be linked to battery degradation. This knowledge may be of great value when implementing algorithms aimed to predict the End-of-Life (EoL) of the battery in terms of temperature, voltage, and discharge current measurements. The purpose of this article is to introduce the reader to several types of Li-ion battery models, and show how the internal impedance of a Li-ion battery is a dynamic parameter that depends on different factors; and then, illustrate how the EIS can be used to obtain an equivalent circuit model and how the different electronic components vary with the use given to the battery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.36001/ijphm.2018.v9i3.2746

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pérez, A., Benavides, M., Rozas, H., Seria, S., & Orchard, M.
Affiliations
University of Chile (CL)
Venue
International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management
Publisher
PHM Society
Published
2020-11-20
Volume
9
Issue
3
ISSN
2153-2648 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3136515962
Cited by
16
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Universidad de Chile (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Universidad de Costa Rica (1170044)
  • Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (FB0008, 1170044)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
Keywords
lithium-ion batteries, internal impedance, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, battery degradation, prognostics and health management, end-of-life prediction, equivalent circuit model, battery model, accelerated degradation testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review