PreprintCited by 57

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey of its Applications, Challenges, Limitations, and Future Prospects

Hadi, Muhammad Usman, Tashi, Qasem Al, Qureshi, Rizwan, Shah, Abbas, Muneer, Amgad, Irfan, Muhammad, Zafar, Anas, Shaikh, Muhammad Bilal, Akhtar, Naveed, Hassan, Syed Zohaib, Shoman, Maged, Wu, Jia, Mirjalili, Seyedali, Shah, Mubarak·2024

Abstract

Within the vast expanse of computerized language processing, a revolutionary entity known as Large Language Models (LLMs) has emerged, wielding immense power in its capacity to comprehend intricate linguistic patterns and conjure coherent and contextually fitting responses. LLMs are a type of artificial intelligence (AI) that have emerged as powerful tools for a wide range of tasks, including natural language processing (NLP), machine translation, vision applications, and question-answering. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of LLMs, including their history, architecture, training methods, applications, and challenges. We begin by discussing the fundamental concepts of generative AI and the architecture of generative pre-trained transformers (GPT). We then provide an overview of the history of LLMs, their evolution over time, and the different training methods that have been used to train them. We then discuss the wide range of tasks where they are used and also discuss applications of LLMs in different domains, including medicine, education, finance, engineering, media, entertainment, politics, and law. We also discuss how LLMs are shaping the future of AI and their increasing role in scientific discovery, and how they can be used to solve real-world problems. Next, we explore the challenges associated with deploying LLMs in real-world scenarios, including ethical considerations, model biases, interpretability, and computational resource requirements. This survey also highlights techniques for enhancing the robustness and controllability of LLMs and addressing bias, fairness, and quality issues in Generative AI. Finally, we conclude by highlighting the future of LLM research and the challenges that need to be addressed in order to make this technology more reliable and useful. This survey is intended to provide researchers, practitioners, and enthusiasts with a comprehensive understanding of LLMs, their evolution, applications, and challenges. By consolidating the state-of-the-art knowledge in the field, this article is anticipated to serve as a valuable resource for learning the current state-of-the-art as well as further advancements in the development and utilization of LLMs for a wide range of real-world applications. The GitHub repo for this project is available at https://github.com/anas-zafar/LLM-Survey

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.36227/techrxiv.23589741.v6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hadi, M. U., Tashi, Q. A., Qureshi, R., Shah, A., Muneer, A., Irfan, M., Zafar, A., Shaikh, M. B., Akhtar, N., Hassan, S. Z., Shoman, M., Wu, J., Mirjalili, S., & Shah, M.
Affiliations
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Published
2024-08-12
Cited by
57
References
0
Type
Preprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review