The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey of its Applications, Challenges, Limitations, and Future Prospects
Abstract
Within the vast expanse of computerized language processing, a revolutionary entity known as Large Language Models (LLMs) has emerged, wielding immense power in its capacity to comprehend intricate linguistic patterns and conjure coherent and contextually fitting responses. LLMs are a type of artificial intelligence (AI) that have emerged as powerful tools for a wide range of tasks, including natural language processing (NLP), machine translation, vision applications, and question-answering. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of LLMs, including their history, architecture, training methods, applications, and challenges. We begin by discussing the fundamental concepts of generative AI and the architecture of generative pre-trained transformers (GPT). We then provide an overview of the history of LLMs, their evolution over time, and the different training methods that have been used to train them. We then discuss the wide range of tasks where they are used and also discuss applications of LLMs in different domains, including medicine, education, finance, engineering, media, entertainment, politics, and law. We also discuss how LLMs are shaping the future of AI and their increasing role in scientific discovery, and how they can be used to solve real-world problems. Next, we explore the challenges associated with deploying LLMs in real-world scenarios, including ethical considerations, model biases, interpretability, and computational resource requirements. This survey also highlights techniques for enhancing the robustness and controllability of LLMs and addressing bias, fairness, and quality issues in Generative AI. Finally, we conclude by highlighting the future of LLM research and the challenges that need to be addressed in order to make this technology more reliable and useful. This survey is intended to provide researchers, practitioners, and enthusiasts with a comprehensive understanding of LLMs, their evolution, applications, and challenges. By consolidating the state-of-the-art knowledge in the field, this article is anticipated to serve as a valuable resource for learning the current state-of-the-art as well as further advancements in the development and utilization of LLMs for a wide range of real-world applications. The GitHub repo for this project is available at https://github.com/anas-zafar/LLM-Survey
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“AI chatbots powered by large language models (LLMs) demonstrate increasingly powerful capabilities in natural language understanding, reasoning, and generation (Naveed et al., 2023;Hadi et al., 2024).”
From Cheating in the second year of generative AI chatbots: a follow-up study on high school student cheating behaviors (2026) · cites this paper as Hadi et al., 2024
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Don’t Be Fooled: The Misinformation Effect of Explanations in Human–AI Collaboration
Spitzer, P., Holstein, J., Morrison, K., Holstein, K., Satzger, G., & Kühl, N. (2026) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2574511 · Cited by 12
Chen, R., Lee, V. R., Kuo, A. C., Pope, D. C., & Miles, S. (2026) · Educational technology research and development · doi:10.1007/s11423-026-10587-1 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Hadi, M. U., Tashi, Q. A., Qureshi, R., Shah, A., Muneer, A., Irfan, M., Zafar, A., Shaikh, M. B., Akhtar, N., Hassan, S. Z., Shoman, M., Wu, J., Mirjalili, S., & Shah, M.
- Affiliations
- MD Anderson Cancer Center
- Published
- 2024-08-12
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 0
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review