The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antioxidant and nutraceutical value of wild medicinal Rubus berries
Abstract
Nutritional quality and antioxidant capacity of three edible wild berries
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In a previous study, Ahmad et al. (47) reported 15, 8.6, 6.2, and 0.175 mg/g of Na, K, Ca, and Zn, respectively, in R. ellipticus fruits (47).”
From Effect of altitude and harvest year on nutraceutical characteristics of Rubus ellipticus fruits (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lamichhane, A., Lamichhane, G., & Devkota, H. P. (2023) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules28166071 · Cited by 28
Effect of altitude and harvest year on nutraceutical characteristics of Rubus ellipticus fruits
Dhatwalia, J., Kumari, A., Guleria, I., Kumar Shukla, R., Saleh, N., El-Nashar, H. A. S., & El-Shazly, M. (2024) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2024.1419862 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahmad, M.
- Venue
- Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Published
- 2015-01-01
- ISSN
- 1011-601X
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antioxidant and nutraceutical value of wild medicinal Rubus berries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.36721/pjps/28/1/01.01.2015/2545/241-247
- The paper
- Ahmad, M. (2015). Antioxidant and nutraceutical value of wild medicinal Rubus berries. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.36721/pjps/28/1/01.01.2015/2545/241-247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
