Effectiveness of AI in Enhancing Quality Higher Education: A Survey Study
Open accessAbstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has gained significant attention recently, with the potential to transform the learning experience and enhance educational quality. This study investigates the effectiveness of AI in enhancing the quality of higher education from the perspective of stakeholders, including students, faculty, and administrators. A survey method was employed to gather data on the perceived impact of AI on various aspects of higher education, such as teaching and learning, assessment, and administrative processes. The study examined the influence of factors such as gender, age, locality, and type of management on the perceptions of AI's effectiveness. The findings provide valuable insights into the current state of AI adoption in higher education and offer recommendations for optimizing its implementation to improve educational quality.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Algorithms adapt content delivery to student profiles, learning performance, and individual preferences, enabling differentiated difficulty levels and targeted scaffolding.
“Algorithms adapt content delivery to student profiles, learning performance, and individual preferences, enabling differentiated difficulty levels and targeted scaffolding [53].”
From Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A State-of-the-Art Overview of Pedagogical Integrity, Artificial Intelligence Literacy, and Policy Integration (2025) · cites this paper as [53]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
(2019) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/0000165-000 · Cited by 542 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Brill, T. M., & Galloway, C. (2007). Integrating AI into education: A meta-study. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 36(1), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.36.1.b · DOI
- Almutiry, O., Forsythe, H., & Wake, J. D. (2022). Artificial intelligence and digital education: An exploratory review of K-12 and higher education contexts. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 1079-1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10632-w · DOI
- Chassignol, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence in higher education: A literature review. AI and Ethics, 1(4), 441-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00065-5 · DOI
- Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2022). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on higher education: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 36, 100455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100455 · DOI · Paper page
- Zawacki-Richter, O., Baer, M., Kramer, V., Krämer, N. C., Kiili, K., & Vlachopoulos, D. (2022). Artificial intelligence and higher education: A bibliometric analysis. International Review of Education, 68(2), 243-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-022-09950-2 · DOI
- Zhai, X. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: From myth to reality. In K. G. Li, T. L. Wong, S. K. S. Cheung, J. Lam, & K. K. Ng (Eds.), Technology in education: Pedagogic practices and the new normal (pp. 21-41). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1005-3_2 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Adamakis, M., & Rachiotis, T. (2025) · Encyclopedia · doi:10.3390/encyclopedia5040180 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
- Authors
- -, D. M. K., & -, K. B.
- Affiliations
- Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
- Venue
- International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
- Published
- 2024-07-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 2582-2160 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4400389821
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-sa
- Locations
- International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Challenges
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in higher education, educational quality, stakeholder perspectives, artificial intelligence adoption, teaching-learning process, assessment, administrative processes, gender differences, age differences, institutional type
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
