How do we respond to generative AI in education? Open educational practices give us a framework for an ongoing process
Open accessAbstract
With the release of ChatGPT in November 2022, the field of higher education rapidly became aware that generative AI can complete or assist in many of the kinds of tasks traditionally used for assessment. This has come as a shock, on the heels of the shock of the pandemic. How should assessment practices change? Should we teach about generative AI or use it pedagogically? If so, how? Here, we propose that a set of open educational practices, inspired by both the Open Educational Resources (OER) movement and digital collaboration practices popularized in the pandemic, can help educators cope and perhaps thrive in an era of rapidly evolving AI. These practices include turning toward online communities that cross institutional and disciplinary boundaries. Social media, listservs, groups, and public annotation can be spaces for educators to share early, rough ideas and practices and reflect on these as we explore emergent responses to AI. These communities can facilitate crowdsourced curation of articles and learning materials. Licensing such resources for reuse and adaptation allows us to build on what others have done and update resources. Collaborating with students allows emergent, student-centered, and student-guided approaches as we learn together about AI and contribute to societal discussions about its future. We suggest approaching all these modes of response to AI as provisional and subject to reflection and revision with respect to core values and educational philosophies. In this way, we can be quicker and more agile even as the technology continues to change. We give examples of these practices from the Spring of 2023 and call for recognition of their value and for material support for them going forward. These open practices can help us collaborate across institutions, countries, and established power dynamics to enable a richer, more justly distributed emerging response to AI.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Since the initial reaction against ChatGPT, an acceptance that the use of GenAI is an inescapable reality has predominated in higher education.
“Since this initial burst of reactionism, however, an acceptance that the use of GenAI is an inescapable reality has predominated (Alharbi, 2023; Mills et al., 2023).”
From Artificial Intelligence for Academic Purposes (AIAP): Integrating AI literacy into an EAP module (2025) · cites this paper as Mills et al., 2023
Cites
The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
What ChatGPT means for universities: Perceptions of scholars and students
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.22 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Lambert, S., Pazurek, A., Crompton, H., Koseoglu, S., Farrow, R., Bond, M., Nerantzi, C., Honeychurch, S., et al. (2023) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7636568 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Samala, A. D., Rawas, S., Wang, T., Reed, J. M., Kim, J., Howard, N.-J., & Ertz, M. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12936-0 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Cai, L., Msafiri, M. M., & Kangwa, D. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13112-0 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Msambwa, M. M., Wen, Z., & Daniel, K. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12909 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence for Academic Purposes (AIAP): Integrating AI literacy into an EAP module
Ngo, T. N., & Hastie, D. (2025) · English for Specific Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.esp.2024.09.001 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“Since this initial burst of reactionism, however, an acceptance that the use of GenAI is an inescapable reality has predominated (Alharbi, 2023; Mills et al., 2023).”
Daniel, K., Msambwa, M. M., & Wen, Z. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70036 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Generative AI and the future of connectivist learning in higher education
Liang, E. S., & Bai, S. (2025) · Journal of Asian Public Policy · doi:10.1080/17516234.2024.2386085 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Hassoulas, A., Powell, N., Roberts, L., Umla-Runge, K., Gray, L., & Coffey, M. J. (2023) · Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.13 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Editorial: There's an AI for that: Rhetoric, reality, and reflections on EdTech in the dawn of GenAI
Concannon, F., Costello, E., Farrell, O., Farrelly, T., & Graves Wolf, L. (2023) · Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.22554/ijtel.v7i1.116 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mills, A., Bali, M., & Eaton, L.
- Affiliations
- College of Marin (US)
- American University in Cairo (EG)
- Providence College (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching
- Publisher
- Kaplan Business School, Australia
- Published
- 2023-06-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2591-801X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4380272592
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 12
- FWCI
- 20.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Education and E-Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
- Keywords
- generative AI in education, ChatGPT, higher education assessment, open educational practices, open educational resources, online collaboration, student-centered learning, student cooperation, artificial intelligence in education, philosophy of education, power relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review