The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stepping into language mastery: Virtual Reality simulations as catalysts for EFL pronunciation enhancement
Open accessAbstract
A virtual reality (VR) simulation-based intervention was compared to conventional pronunciation teaching in an experimental study. The experimental and control groups were assigned at random, with the experimental group using virtual reality to practice pronunciation and the control group using traditional classroom teaching. Pre-post-intervention assessments included pronunciation tests and subjective self-evaluations. T-tests/ANCOVA were used to compare experimental and control group pronunciation test results. The self-evaluation questionnaires’ qualitative data were evaluated thematically to determine students’ virtual reality simulation experiences. Virtual reality simulation-based education was expected to increase English as a Foreign Language (EFL) pronunciation abilities more than the control group. Students in the experimental group were predicted to be more engaged and satisfied with virtual reality simulations. This research adds to the literature on EFL pronunciation training. It suggests that virtual reality influences Jordanian EFL pedagogy and proposes using virtual reality simulations in pronunciation training to promote language acquisition.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fluency is considered by many researchers to be one of the central elements of second or foreign language acquisition.
“Fluency is considered by many researchers to be one of the central elements of second or foreign language (L2 or FL) acquisition due to its obviousness and its outstanding significance (Ozturk & Soyer, 2021; Rababah, 2023; Rababah et al., 2023) .”
From An Experimental Study of the Effectiveness of Role-play in Improving Fluency in Jordanian EFL Students' Speaking Skills (2025) · cites this paper as Rababah, 2023
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rababah, L. M. (2025) · World Journal of English Language · doi:10.5430/wjel.v15n4p30 · Cited by 12
Self-citationRababah, L. M., Alqaryouti, M. H., Huwari, I. F., Alruzzi, K., & Al-Khasawneh, F. M. (2025) · Forum for Linguistic Studies · doi:10.30564/fls.v7i1.7538 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rababah, L. M.
- Affiliations
- Jadara University (JO)
- Corresponding author
- Luqman Mahmoud Rababah
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching
- Publisher
- Kaplan Business School, Australia
- Published
- 2023-11-29
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- Special Issue 1
- ISSN
- 2591-801X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4390032475
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 1.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Keywords
- virtual reality, pronunciation teaching, EFL pronunciation, language immersion, simulation-based instruction, student engagement, student satisfaction, language acquisition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review