Digital Technology Innovations in Education in Remote First Nations
Open accessAbstract
Using a critical settler colonialism lens, we explore how digital technologies are being used for new education opportunities and First Nation control of these processes in remote First Nations. Decolonization is about traditional lands and creating the conditions necessary so Indigenous people can live sustainably in their territories (Simpson, 2014; Tuck & Yang, 2012). Remote First Nations across Canada face considerable challenges related to accessing quality adult education programs in their communities. Our study, conducted in partnership with the Keewaytinook Okimakanak Research Institute, explores how community members living in remote First Nations in Northwestern Ontario are using digital technologies for informal and formal learning experiences. We conducted an online survey in early 2014, including open-ended questions to ensure the community members’ voices were heard. The critical analysis relates the findings to the ongoing project of decolonization, and in particular, how new educational opportunities supported by digital technology enable community members to remain in their communities if they choose to, close to their traditional lands
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These include using the Internet and web-based resources to share land-based planning activities, such as information about hunting, fishing and other traditional economic activities.
“These include using the Internet and web-based resources to share land-based planning activities, such as information about hunting, fishing and other traditional economic activities (Beaton & Carpenter, 2016).”
From Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization (2021) · cites this paper as Beaton & Carpenter, 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- Alfred, T. (2009). Colonialism and state dependency. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 5(2), 42-60. Retrieved from http://www.naho.ca/jah/english/jah05_02/V5_I2_Colonialism_02.pdf
- Barker, A. J. (2009). The contemporary reality of Canadian imperialism: Settler colonialism and the hybrid colonial state. American Indian Quarterly, 33(3), 325 -351.
- Beaton, B., & Campbell, P. (2014). Settler colonialism and First Nations e-communities in Northwestern Ontario. The Journal of Community Informatics, 10(2).
- Beaton, B., & Carpenter, P. (2015). Creating appropriate participatory action research with remote First Nations. Antistasis, 5(2), 50 -61. Retrieved from https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/antistasis/article/view/24295/28154
- Beaton, B., Perley, D., George, C., & O'Donnell, S. (in press). Engaging remote Indigenous communities using appropriate online research methods. In N. Fielding, R. M. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), The Sage handbook of online research methods (2nd ed.) London, UK: Sage.
- Budka, P., Bell, B. L., & Fiser, A. (2009). MyKnet.org: How Northern Ontario's First Nation communities made themselves at home on the World Wide Web. Journal of Community Informatics, 5(2).
- Carpenter, P. (2010). The Kuhkenah Network (K-Net). In J. P. White, J. Peters, D. Beavon, & P. Dinsdale (Eds.), Aboriginal policy research VI: Learning, technology and traditions (pp. 119 -127). Toronto, ON: Thompson Educational.
- Carpenter, P., Gibson, K., Kakekaspan, C., & O'Donnell, S. (2013). How women in remote and rural First Nation communities are using information and communication technologies (ICT). [Special issue]. Journal of Rural Community Development, 8(2), 79 -97. in education 22(1) Spring 2016
- Corntassel, J. (2012). Re-envisioning resurgence: Indigenous pathways to decolonization and sustainable self-determination. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 86 -101.
- Coulthard, G. (2007). Subjects of empire: Indigenous peoples and the 'politics of recognition' in Canada. Contemporary Political Theory, 6(4), 437 -460.
- Donald, D. T. (2009). Forts, curriculum, and indigenous métissage: Imagining decolonization of Aboriginal-Canadian relations in educational contexts. First Nations Perspectives, 2(1), 1- 24.
- Dyson, L. E., & Hendriks, M., (Eds.). (2007). Information technology and Indigenous people: Issues and perspectives: Hershey, PA: Information Science.
- Iseke-Barnes, J., & Danard, D. (2007). Indigenous knowledges and worldview: Representations and the Internet. In L. E. Dyson, M. Hendriks, S. Grant (Eds.), Information technology and Indigenous people (pp. 27-36). Hershey, PA: Information Science.
- Kindon, S. L., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (2007). Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place. London, UK: Routledge.
- Lockhart, E., Tenasco, A., Whiteduck, T., & O'Donnell, S. (2014). Information and communication technology for education in an Algonquin First Nation in Quebec. Journal of Community Informatics, 10(2).
- McMahon, R., Gurstein, M., Beaton, B., O'Donnell, S., & Whiteduck, T. (2014). Making information technologies work at the end of the road. Journal of Information Policy , 4(1).
- McMahon, R., O'Donnell, S., Smith, R., Walmark, B., Beaton, B., & Simmonds, J. (2011). Digital divides and the 'first mile': Framing First Nations broadband development in Canada. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 2(2). Retrieved from: http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/iipj/vol2/iss2/2
- McMullen, B., & Rorhbach, A. (2003). Distance education in remote Aboriginal communities: Barriers, learning styles and best practices. Prince George, BC: College of New Caledonia Press.
- Molyneaux, H., O'Donnell, S., Kakekaspan, C., Walmark, B., Budka, P., & Gibson, K. (2014) Social media in remote First Nation communities. Canadian Journal of Communication.
- O'Donnell, S., Perley, S., Walmark, B., Burton, K., Beaton, B., & Sark, A. (2009). Community- based broadband organizations and video communications in remote and rural First Nations in Canada. In L. Stillman, G. Johanson, & R. French (Eds.), Communities in action (pp. 107 -119). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
- Palmater, P. (2011). Stretched beyond human limits: Death by poverty in First Nations. Canadian Review of Social Policy, 65/66, 112 -127.
- Pasch, T. J. (2015, July). Towards the enhancement of Arctic digital industries: 'Translating' cultural content to new media platforms. Jostrans, the Journal of Specialized Translations, 24.
- Perley, S. (2009). Representation and participation of First Nations women in online videos. Journal of Community Informatics. 5(1).
- Potter, D. (2010). Keewaytinook Internet High School review (2003-2008).
- In J. P. White, J. Peters, D. Beavon, & P. Dinsdale (Eds), Aboriginal policy research VI: Learning, technology and traditions (pp. 148 -157). Toronto, ON: Thompson Educational.
- Schnarch, B. (2004), Ownership, control, access, and possession (OCAP) or self-determination applied to research: A critical analysis of contemporary First Nations research and some options for First Nations communities. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 1(1), 80 -95.
- Simon, J., Burton, K., Lockhart, E., & O'Donnell, S. (2014) Post-secondary distance education in a contemporary colonial context: Experiences of students in a rural First Nation in Canada. The International Review of Research on Open and Distance Learning, 1(15), 1 -19.
- Simpson, L. (2014). Land as pedagogy: Nishnaabeg intelligence and rebellious transformation. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3(3), 1 -25.
- Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). London, UK: Zed Books.
- Snelgrove, C., Dhamoon, R. K., & Corntassel, J. (2014). Unsettling settler colonialism: The discourse and politics of settlers, and solidarity with Indigenous nations. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3(2), 1 -32.
- Todd, L. (1996). Aboriginal narratives in cyberspace. In M. A. Moser & D. Macleod (Eds.), Immersed in technology: Art and virtual environments (pp. 179 -104). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Tuck, E. (2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79(3), 408 -429.
- Tuck, E., & Yang, K-W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1 -40.
- Walmark, B. (2010). Digital education in remote Aboriginal communities. In J.P. White, J. Peters, D. Beavon, & P. Dinsdale (Eds.), Aboriginal policy research VI: Learning, technology and traditions (pp. 141 -147). Toronto, ON: Thompson Educational.
- Whiteduck, G., Tenasco, A., O'Donnell, S., Whiteduck, T., & Lockhart E. (2014). Developing an e-community approach to community services in Kitigan Zibi Anishinabeg First Nation. Journal of Community Informatics, 10(2).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization
Meighan, P. J. (2021) · AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples · doi:10.1177/11771801211037672 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
- Authors
- Beaton, B., & Carpenter, P.
- Affiliations
- University of New Brunswick (CA)
- Venue
- in education
- Publisher
- University of Regina Library
- Published
- 2016-06-13
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 42-60
- ISSN
- 1927-6117 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2425957622
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- in education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Migration, Education, Indigenous Social Dynamics
- Keywords
- digital technologies in education, decolonization, settler colonialism, informal learning, indigenous peoples, northwestern Ontario
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review