Cited by 8Composting and Vermicomposting TechniquesWastewater Treatment and ReuseConstructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment

Impact of effective microorganisms bacteria on low-input sewage sludge treatment

Open access
Boruszko, Dariusz, Butarewicz, Andrzej·2015·Environment Protection Engineering

Abstract

Six-month experiments have been carried out using pilot installations of low-budget methods of sewage sludge treatment.Sewage sludge was processed using vermiculture or plants such as willow or reed.The study was also conducted in a solar dryer.In some parts of the research, effective microorganisms were used.The results of the sediment research, including: contents of organic and mineral matter, hydration reaction, contents of nitrogen and phosphorus, as well as the indicators of the sanitary condition, were presented.The results confirmed a perceptible influence of the effective microorganisms on the structure of the dry mass of dairy sewage dewatered on reed and willow plots or transformed into vermicompost.A slight, however, apparent difference in a faster and more effective mineralization of organic substances contained in the sludge after half a year of processing, as well as significant reduction of the number of potential pathogenic bacteria was observed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.37190/epe150407

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. HIGA T., Effective microorganisms. A new dimension for nature farming, Proc. of the Second Interna- tional Conference on Kyusei Nature Farming, Atami, Japan, J.F. Parr, S.B. Hornick, M.E. Simpson (Eds.), U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1994, 20.
  2. REGANOLD J.P., PAPENDICK R.I., PARR J.F., Sustainable agriculture, Sci. Amer., 1990, 262 (6), 112.
  3. PARR J.F., PAPENDICK S.B., HORNICK R.E., MEYER R.E., Soil quality. Attributes and relationship to al- ternative and sustainable agriculture, Amer. J. Alter. Agric. 1992, 7, 5.
  4. DEVI S., MANIMARAN S., Study of effective microorganisms (EM) on different organic wastes and their effect on growth and yield of rice, Int. J. Pharm. Life Sci., 2012, 3 (6), 1773.
  5. MAYERA J., SCHEIDA S., WIDMERA F., FLIESSBACH A., OBERHOLZER H.R., How effective are Effec- tive microorganisms (EM)? Results from a field study In temperate climate, Appl. Soil Ecol., 2010, 46, 230.
  6. ZHOU G., LI J., FAN H.S.J., ZHAO X., Starch wastewater treatment with effective microorganisms bac- teria, 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (iCBBE), Chengdu, China, 18-20 June 2010, eBook, DOI: 10.1109/ICBBE.2010.5517170. · DOI
  7. ZHOU G., SUN J., Study on effective microorganisms bacteria for acrylonitrile wastewater treatment, 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (iCBBE), Chengdu, China, 18-20 June 2010, eBook, DOI: 10.1109/ICBBE.2010.5517301. · DOI
  8. LIAO L., SHAO X., XU J.Z., WALTER M., Effects of different EM solution addition ratios and incubation methods on dairy effluents treatment, 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (iCBBE), Shanghai, China, 16-18 May 2008, eBook, DOI: 10.1109/ICBBE.2008.370. · DOI
  9. WANG H., MAGESAN G.N., BOLAN N.S., An overview of the environmental effects of land application of farm effluents, New Zealand J. Agricult. Res., 2004, 47 (4), 389.
  10. HEO S.U., MOON S.Y., YOON K.S., KIM Y.J., KOO Y.M., Enhanced compost maturity by effective mi- croorganisms, Abstracts, J. Biotechn., 2008, 136, 65.
  11. BORUSZKO D., Aplication of heavy metals and nutrients into natural environment with sewage sludge, Ecol. Chem. Eng. A, 2011, 18 (9-10), 1193.
  12. BORUSZKO D., Research and evaluation of compost fertilizer and vermicompost, Rocz. Ochr. Środ., 2011, 13 (2), 1417 (in Polish).
  13. STOTTMEISTER U., WIEßNER A., KUSCHK P., KAPPELMEYER U., KASTNER M., BEDERSKI O., MUELLER R.A., MOORMANN H., Effects of plants and microorganisms in constructed wetlands for wastewater treat- ment, Biotechnol. Adv., 2003, 22, 93.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boruszko, D., & Butarewicz, A.
Affiliations
Bialystok University of Technology (PL)
Venue
Environment Protection Engineering
Published
2015
Volume
41
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0324-8828 (ISSN-L)
  • 2450-260X
OpenAlex
W2580850507
Cited by
8
References
2
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environment Protection Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
Keywords
effective microorganisms, sewage sludge treatment, vermicompost, vermiculture, willow, reed, solar dryer, dairy wastewater, organic matter mineralization, nitrogen and phosphorus, pathogen inactivation, sludge dewatering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review