Cited by 6Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchDental Health and Care UtilizationPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments

Effects of a Dental Gel Over 6 Months on Periodontal Health in Subjects with Stage II and III (Mild and Moderate) Periodontitis

Open access
M Cobb, Charles·2019·Journal of Dentistry and Oral Sciences

Abstract

Objective: Overall aim of this prospective, randomized, positive controlled, double-blind in vivo study was to identify the effects of a test dental gel containing 2.6% edathamil with an added carrier and permeability enhancer vs. a positive control dentifrice on periodontal health measures in patients with Stage II and III periodontitis. Methods: In this prospective double-blinded, randomized study, 33 subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to brushing their teeth with either the test gel (LivFresh®, Livionex Dental Gel, Los Gatos, CA 95030) or the positive control toothpaste (Crest ProHealth®, P&G, Cincinnati, OH 45202).Full-mouth gingival index, modified sulcus bleeding index, and periodontal pocket probing depths were recorded for all teeth at baseline, and on days 90 and 180.Subjects brushed with the study material twice a day. Results: The test dental gel reduced gingival inflammation and bleeding, as well as periodontal pocket probing depths significantly more than a control dentifrice. Conclusions: In this pilot study in subjects with Stage II and III periodontitis, a test dental gel was found to improve gingival inflammation and bleeding, as well as periodontal pocket depths significantly better than a control dentifrice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.37191/mapsci-2582-3736-1(3)-019

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [1]Haffajee AD. Microbial etiological agents of destructive periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000. 1994; 5: 78– 111. 9673164
  2. [2]Page RC. The etiology and pathogenesis of periodontitis. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2002; 23(Suppl 5): 11– 14. 12789963
  3. [3]Theilade E, Wright WH, Jensen SB, Löe H. Experimental gingivitis in man: II. A longitudinal clinical and bacteriological investigation. Jl periodontal res. 1966; 1(1): 1– 3. 4224181
  4. [4]Axelsson P, Lindhe J. The significance of maintenance care in the treatment of periodontal disease. J clinic periodontol. 1981; 8(4): 281– 94. 6947992
  5. [6]Nogueira‐ Filho GR, Toledo S, Cury JA. Effect of 3 dentifrices containing triclosan and various additives: an experimental gingivitis study. J clin periodontal. 2000; 27(7): 494– 8. 10914890
  6. [8]Lippert F, Arrageg MA, Eckert GJ, Hara AT. Interaction between toothpaste abrasivity and toothbrush filament stiffness on the development of erosive/abrasive lesions in vitro. Int Dent J. 2017; 67 (6): 344– 50. 28574173 PMC9378893
  7. [9]Feng X, Chen A, Zhang Y, Wang J, Shao L, Wei W. Application of dental nanomaterials: potential toxicity to the central nervous system. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015; 10: 3547– 65. 25999717 PMC4437601
  8. [10]Morris AJ, Steele J, White DA. The oral cleanliness and periodontal health of UK adults in 1998. Br Dent J. 2001; 191(4): 186– 92. 11551090
  9. [11]Yates R, Jenkins S, Newcombe R, Wade W, Moran J, Addy M. A 6-month home usage trial of a 1% chlorhexidine toothpaste (1). Effects on plaque, gingivitis, calculus and tooth staining. J Clin Periodontol. 1993; 20(2): 130– 8 8436632
  10. [12]Madlena M, Banoczy J, Gotz G, Marton S, Kaan M, Nagy G. Effects of amine and stannous fluorides on plaque accumulation and gingival health in orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliances: A pilot study. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2012; 11(2): 57– 61. 22692271
  11. [13]Barkvoll P Should toothpastes foam? Sodium lauryl sulfate--a toothpaste detergent in focus. Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid. 1989; 99(3): 82– 4. 2696932
  12. [14]Lee AY, Yoo SH, Oh JG, Kim YG. 2 cases of allergic contact cheilitis from sodium lauryl sulfate in toothpaste. Contact Dermatitis. 2000; 42(2): 111 10703642
  13. [15]Herlofson BB, Barkvoll P. Sodium lauryl sulfate and recurrent aphthous ulcers. A preliminary study. Acta Odontol Scand. 1994; 52(5): 257– 9. 7825393
  14. [16]Randhawa S, Bahna SL. Hypersensitivity reactions to food additives. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009; 9(3): 278– 83. 19390435
  15. [18]Zhang M, Wong IG, Gin JB, Ansari NH. Assessment of methylsulfonylmethane as a permeability enhancer for regional EDTA chelation therapy. Drug Deliv. 2009; 16: 243– 8. 19538004
  16. [19]Fang X, Keutgen XM, Jiang Y, Sherertz R, Hachem R. The role of chelators in preventing biofilm formation and catheter-related bloodstream infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2008; 21: 385– 92. 18594291
  17. [20]Dadkhah M, Chung NE, Ajdaharian J, Wink C, Klokkevold P, Wilder-Smith P. Effects of a novel dental gel on plaque and gingivitis: A comparative study. Dentistry (Sunnyvale). 2014; 4(6): 239. 26052472 PMC4454341
  18. [22]Anbarani AG, Wink C, Ho J, Lam T, Sahni K, Forghany A Dental Plaque Removal and Re-Accumulation: A Clinical Randomized Pilot Study Evaluating a Gel Dentifrice Containing 2.6%Edathamil. J Clin Dent. 2018; 29(2): 40– 44. 30211989
  19. [23]Anbarani AG, Ho J, Vu TH, Forghany A, Lam T, Khashai E A double-blinded, randomized study evaluating the in vivo effects of a novel dental gel on enamel surface microstructure and microhardness. J Clin Dent. 2017; 28(3): 49– 55. 29211951
  20. [25]Löe H The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. J Periodontol 1967; 38(6):(Suppl): 610– 16. 5237684
  21. [26]Newbrun E Indices to measure gingival bleeding. J Periodontol. 1996; 67(6): 555– 61. 8794964

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
M Cobb, C.
Affiliations
Professor Emeritus, Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.
Venue
Journal of Dentistry and Oral Sciences
Published
2019-11-18
Volume
1
Issue
3
ISSN
2582-3736 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2994923874
Cited by
6
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
et
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Dentistry and Oral Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation (LAMMP NIH/NIBIB P41EB05890, NIH/NIBIB R03EB014852.)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Keywords
dental gel, periodontitis, gingivitis, gingival bleeding, probing depth, toothpaste, gingival index, modified sulcus bleeding index, periodontal health, penetration enhancers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review