The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research on Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Abstract
进化多目标优化主要研究如何利用进化计算方法求解多目标优化问题,已经成为进化计算领域的研究热点之一.在简要总结2003年以前的主要算法后,着重对进化多目标优化的最新进展进行了详细讨论.归纳出当前多目标优化的研究趋势,一方面,粒子群优化、人工免疫系统、分布估计算法等越来越多的进化范例被引入多目标优化领域,一些新颖的受自然系统启发的多目标优化算法相继提出;另一方面,为了更有效的求解高维多目标优化问题,一些区别于传统Pareto占优的新型占优机制相继涌现;同时,对多目标优化问题本身性质的研究也在逐步深入.对公认的代表性算法进行了实验对比.最后,对进化多目标优化的进一步发展提出了自己的看法.;Evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO), whose main task is to deal with multi-objective optimization problems by evolutionary computation, has become a hot topic in evolutionary computation community. After summarizing the EMO algorithms before 2003 briefly, the recent advances in EMO are discussed in details. The current research directions are concluded. On the one hand, more new evolutionary paradigms have been introduced into EMO community, such as particle swarm optimization, artificial immune systems, and estimation distribution algorithms. On the other hand, in order to deal with many-objective optimization problems, many new dominance schemes different from traditional Pareto-dominance come forth. Furthermore, the essential characteristics of multi-objective optimization problems are deeply investigated. This paper also gives experimental comparison of several representative algorithms. Finally, several viewpoints for the future research of EMO are proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.996017 · Cited by 50,053
A Global Geometric Framework for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Silva, V. D., & Langford, J. C. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2319 · Cited by 13,585
MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition
Zhang, Q., & Li, H. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2007.892759 · Cited by 10,069
Cited by
New Generation Deep Learning for Video Object Detection: A Survey
Jiao, L., Zhang, R., Liu, F., Yang, S., Hou, B., Li, L., & Tang, X. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3053249 · Cited by 259
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- GONG, M.-G., JIAO, L.-C., YANG, D.-D., & MA, W.-P.
- Venue
- Journal of Software
- Published
- 2009-04-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 271-289
- ISSN
- 1000-9825 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010764608
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Research on Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3724/sp.j.1001.2009.00271
- The paper
- GONG, M.-G., JIAO, L.-C., YANG, D.-D., & MA, W.-P. (2009). Research on Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms. Journal of Software. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1001.2009.00271
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
