Cited by 22Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferencePsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Analyzing Multilevel Mediation Using Multilevel Structural Equation Models

FANG, Jie, WEN, Zhonglin, ZHANG, Minqiang, REN, Hao·2014·Advances in Psychological Science

Abstract

摘要:

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3724/sp.j.1042.2014.00530

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FANG, J., WEN, Z., ZHANG, M., & REN, H.
Affiliations
South China Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • FANG, Jie
  • WEN, Zhonglin
  • ZHANG, Minqiang
  • REN, Hao
Venue
Advances in Psychological Science
Published
2014
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
530
ISSN
1671-3710 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2363947689
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
multilevel mediation, multilevel structural equation modeling, hierarchical data, mediation analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review