The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconstructing the ancestral angiosperm flower and its initial specializations
Open accessAbstract
Increasingly robust understanding of angiosperm phylogeny allows more secure reconstruction of the flower in the most recent common ancestor of extant angiosperms and its early evolution. The surprising emergence of several extant and fossil taxa with simple flowers near the base of the angiosperms—Chloranthaceae, Ceratophyllum, Hydatellaceae, and the Early Cretaceous fossil Archaefructus (the last three are water plants)—has brought a new twist to this problem. We evaluate early floral evolution in angiosperms by parsimony optimization of morphological characters on phylogenetic trees derived from morphological and molecular data. Our analyses imply that Ceratophyllum may be related to Chloranthaceae, and Archaefructus to either Hydatellaceae or Ceratophyllum. Inferred ancestral features include more than two whorls (or series) of tepals and stamens, stamens with protruding adaxial or lateral pollen sacs, several free, ascidiate carpels closed by secretion, extended stigma, extragynoecial compitum, and one or several ventral pendent ovule(s). The ancestral state in other characters is equivocal: e.g., bisexual vs. unisexual flowers, whorled vs. spiral floral phyllotaxis, presence vs. absence of tepal differentiation, anatropous vs. orthotropous ovules. Our results indicate that the simple flowers of the newly recognized basal groups are reduced rather than primitively simple.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Monograph of Schisandra (Schisandraceae)
Saunders, R. M. K. (2000) · Systematic Botany Monographs · doi:10.2307/25027879 · Cited by 99
Cited by
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2016) · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/boj.12385 · Cited by 9,555
THE ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP (2009) · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x · Cited by 4,854
Establishing a time‐scale for plant evolution
Clarke, J. T., Warnock, R. C. M., & Donoghue, P. C. J. (2011) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03794.x · Cited by 351
The ancestral flower of angiosperms and its early diversification
Sauquet, H., von Balthazar, M., Magallón, S., Doyle, J. A., Endress, P. K., Bailes, E. J., Barroso de Morais, E., Bull-Hereñu, K., Carrive, L., Chartier, M., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms16047 · Cited by 336
Self-citationBLANK, C. E., & SÁNCHEZ‐BARACALDO, P. (2010) · Geobiology · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4669.2009.00220.x · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Endress, P. K., & Doyle, J. A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22-66
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2118149874
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconstructing the ancestral angiosperm flower and its initial specializations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3732/ajb.0800047
- The paper
- Endress, P. K., & Doyle, J. A. (2009). Reconstructing the ancestral angiosperm flower and its initial specializations. American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0800047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.