The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A synthesis of plant invasion effects on biodiversity across spatial scales
Abstract
• Premise of the study: Invasive plant species are typically thought to pose a large threat to native biodiversity, and local‐scale studies typically confirm this view. However, plant invaders rarely cause regional extirpations or global extinctions, causing some to suggest that invasive species’ influence on native biodiversity may not be so dire. We aim to synthesize the seemingly conflicting literature in plant invasion biology by evaluating the effects of invasive plant species across spatial scales. • Methods: We first conducted a meta‐analysis on the effects of invasive plants on the species richness of invaded communities across a range of spatial extents. We then discuss studies that consider the role of invasive plants on regional spatial scales for which such meta‐analyses are not possible. Finally, we develop a conceptual framework to synthesize the influence of invasive species across spatial scales by explicitly recognizing how invasive species alter species‐occupancy distributions. • Key results: We found a negative relationship between the spatial extent of the study and the effect size of invasive plants on species richness. Our simulation models suggest that this result can occur if invaders, either proportionately or disproportionately, reduce the occupancy of common species to a greater degree than rare species. • Conclusions: Future studies should consider the influence of invaders on the abundance and occupancy‐level changes in native species to inform how invasive plants will influence native species richness relationships across spatial scales. This approach will allow greater predictive ability for forecasting changes in biodiversity in the face of anthropogenic biological invasions and will inform invasive species management and restoration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BIOTIC INVASIONS: CAUSES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES, AND CONTROL
Mack, R. N., Simberloff, D., Mark Lonsdale, W., Evans, H., Clout, M., & Bazzaz, F. A. (2000) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0689:bicegc]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 6,156
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704
Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions
Richardson, D. M., Pyšek, P., Rejmánek, M., Barbour, M. G., Panetta, F. D., & West, C. J. (2000) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00083.x · Cited by 4,058
Biological Invasions by Exotic Grasses, the Grass/Fire Cycle, and Global Change
D'Antonio, C. M., & Vitousek, P. M. (1992) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.000431 · Cited by 3,399
Quantifying Threats to Imperiled Species in the United States
Wilcove, D. S., Rothstein, D., Dubow, J., Phillips, A., & Losos, E. (1998) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1313420 · Cited by 3,097
Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction
McKinney, M. L., & Lockwood, J. L. (1999) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01679-1 · Cited by 2,707
Anderson, M. J., Crist, T. O., Chase, J. M., Vellend, M., Inouye, B. D., Freestone, A. L., Sanders, N. J., Cornell, H. V., Comita, L. S., Davies, K. F., et al. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01552.x · Cited by 2,492
Self-citationGLOBAL PATTERNS OF PLANT INVASIONS AND THE CONCEPT OF INVASIBILITY
Lonsdale, W. M. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1522:gpopia]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,000
The Canonical Distribution of Commonness and Rarity: Part I
Preston, F. W. (1962) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1931976 · Cited by 1,808
Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability
Callaway, R. M., & Ridenour, W. M. (2004) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0436:nwisat]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,632
Cited by
Vilà, M., Espinar, J. L., Hejda, M., Hulme, P. E., Jarošík, V., Maron, J. L., Pergl, J., Schaffner, U., Sun, Y., & Pyšek, P. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x · Cited by 3,068
Pyšek, P., Jarošík, V., Hulme, P. E., Pergl, J., Hejda, M., Schaffner, U., & Vilà, M. (2012) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02636.x · Cited by 1,447
Progress toward understanding the ecological impacts of nonnative species
Ricciardi, A., Hoopes, M. F., Marchetti, M. P., & Lockwood, J. L. (2013) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/13-0183.1 · Cited by 760
Uses and misuses of meta‐analysis in plant ecology
Koricheva, J., & Gurevitch, J. (2014) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12224 · Cited by 460
Disentangling the abundance–impact relationship for invasive species
Bradley, B. A., Laginhas, B. B., Whitlock, R., Allen, J. M., Bates, A. E., Bernatchez, G., Diez, J. M., Early, R., Lenoir, J., Vilà, M., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1818081116 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Powell, K. I., Chase, J. M., & Knight, T. M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 539-548
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2155849697
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 77
- FWCI
- 18.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A synthesis of plant invasion effects on biodiversity across spatial scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3732/ajb.1000402
- The paper
- Powell, K. I., Chase, J. M., & Knight, T. M. (2011). A synthesis of plant invasion effects on biodiversity across spatial scales. American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.