The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Navigating the tip of the genomic iceberg: Next‐generation sequencing for plant systematics
Open accessAbstract
• Premise of the study: Just as Sanger sequencing did more than 20 years ago, next‐generation sequencing (NGS) is poised to revolutionize plant systematics. By combining multiplexing approaches with NGS throughput, systematists may no longer need to choose between more taxa or more characters. Here we describe a genome skimming (shallow sequencing) approach for plant systematics. • Methods: Through simulations, we evaluated optimal sequencing depth and performance of single‐end and paired‐end short read sequences for assembly of nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and plastomes and addressed the effect of divergence on reference‐guided plastome assembly. We also used simulations to identify potential phylogenetic markers from low‐copy nuclear loci at different sequencing depths. We demonstrated the utility of genome skimming through phylogenetic analysis of the Sonoran Desert clade (SDC) of Asclepias (Apocynaceae). • Key results: Paired‐end reads performed better than single‐end reads. Minimum sequencing depths for high quality rDNA and plastome assemblies were 40× and 30×, respectively. Divergence from the reference significantly affected plastome assembly, but relatively similar references are available for most seed plants. Deeper rDNA sequencing is necessary to characterize intragenomic polymorphism. The low‐copy fraction of the nuclear genome was readily surveyed, even at low sequencing depths. Nearly 160000 bp of sequence from three organelles provided evidence of phylogenetic incongruence in the SDC. • Conclusions: Adoption of NGS will facilitate progress in plant systematics, as whole plastome and rDNA cistrons, partial mitochondrial genomes, and low‐copy nuclear markers can now be efficiently obtained for molecular phylogenetics studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools
Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., Marth, G., Abecasis, G., Durbin, R., & 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · Cited by 62,041
Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · Cited by 58,607
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2011) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msr121 · Cited by 39,969
Hall, T. A. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Symposium Series · doi:10.14601/phytopathol_mediterr-14998u1.29 · Cited by 38,297
RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models
Stamatakis, A. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 · Cited by 15,582
Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees
Miller, M. A., Pfeiffer, W., & Schwartz, T. (2010) · 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE) · doi:10.1109/gce.2010.5676129 · Cited by 11,228
<tt>BLAT</tt> —The <tt>BLAST</tt> -Like Alignment Tool
Kent, W. J. (2002) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.229202 · Cited by 8,480
A Rapid Bootstrap Algorithm for the RAxML Web Servers
Stamatakis, A., Hoover, P., & Rougemont, J. (2008) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150802429642 · Cited by 7,028
TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis
Goloboff, P. A., Farris, J. S., & Nixon, K. C. (2008) · Cladistics · doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00217.x · Cited by 5,352
Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes
Kurtz, S., Phillippy, A., Delcher, A. L., Smoot, M., Shumway, M., Antonescu, C., & Salzberg, S. L. (2004) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12 · Cited by 5,254
Cited by
Chloroplot: An Online Program for the Versatile Plotting of Organelle Genomes
Zheng, S., Poczai, P., Hyvönen, J., Tang, J., & Amiryousefi, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.576124 · Cited by 382
Kane, N., Sveinsson, S., Dempewolf, H., Yang, J. Y., Zhang, D., Engels, J. M. M., & Cronk, Q. (2012) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.1100570 · Cited by 261
Wales, N., Akman, M., Watson, R. H. B., Sánchez Barreiro, F., Smith, B. D., Gremillion, K. J., Gilbert, M. T. P., & Blackman, B. K. (2019) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.12594 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Straub, S. C. K., Parks, M., Weitemier, K., Fishbein, M., Cronn, R. C., & Liston, A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 349-364
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2135581989
- Cited by
- 696
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 7.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Navigating the tip of the genomic iceberg: Next‐generation sequencing for plant systematics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3732/ajb.1100335
- The paper
- Straub, S. C. K., Parks, M., Weitemier, K., Fishbein, M., Cronn, R. C., & Liston, A. (2012). Navigating the tip of the genomic iceberg: Next‐generation sequencing for plant systematics. American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1100335
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.