Cited by 5,352Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesEvolution and Paleontology StudiesPlant Diversity and Evolution

TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis

Open access
Goloboff, Pablo A., Farris, James S., Nixon, Kevin C.·2008·Cladistics

Abstract

The main features of the phylogeny program TNT are discussed. Windows versions have a menu interface, while Macintosh and Linux versions are command‐driven. The program can analyze data sets with discrete (additive, non‐additive, step‐matrix) as well as continuous characters (evaluated with Farris optimization). Effective analysis of large data sets can be carried out in reasonable times, and a number of methods to help identifying wildcard taxa in the case of ambiguous data sets are implemented. A variety of methods for diagnosing trees and exploring character evolution is available in TNT, and publication‐quality tree‐diagrams can be saved as metafiles. Through the use of a number of native commands and a simple but powerful scripting language, TNT allows the user an enormous flexibility in phylogenetic analyses or simulations. © The Willi Hennig Society 2008.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00217.x

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hovenkamp, P., 2004. Review of TNT-Tree analysis using New Technology, ver. 1.0. Cladistics 20, 378-383.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goloboff, P. A., Farris, J. S., & Nixon, K. C.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • Swedish Museum of Natural History (SE)
  • Cornell University (US)
Venue
Cladistics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09-29
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
774-786
ISSN
  • 0748-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-0031
OpenAlex
W2151692850
Cited by
5,352
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 107 · 2025: 163 · 2024: 206 · 2023: 223 · 2022: 271 · 2021: 330 · 2020: 344 · 2019: 367 · 2018: 388 · 2017: 428 · 2016: 455 · 2015: 431 · 2014: 434 · 2013: 349 · 2012: 312
FWCI
73.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cladistics (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
Keywords
TNT, phylogenetic analysis software, parsimony, continuous characters, discrete characters, character evolution, tree diagrams, scripting languages, phylogenetic simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review