The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Digitization of herbaria enables novel research
Open accessAbstract
As botanists, we recognize that herbarium specimens document spatial and temporal patterns of plant diversity. But they may also tell stories beyond the plants themselves—about how a specimen may have languished for decades in obscurity until a botanist with a keen eye recognized it as a new species (Ziziphus celata; see, e.g., Judd and Hall, 1984; for image, see https://www.floridamuseum.ufl.edu/scripts/dbs/herbs_project/herbsproject/herbs_pub_proc.asp?accno=136888&FamSys=A&output_style=Report_type&trys=2) or of the heroics required to relocate a species in nature (e.g., Shortia galacifolia; https://www.idigbio.org/content/portal-curiosities-asa-gray-and-quest-shortia-galacifolia-%E2%80%93-case-study-importance) or of the metamorphosing nature of collections themselves, with specimens yielding data undreamt of when they were collected (e.g., Inga umbellifera; Hart et al., 2016; for image, see http://elmer.rbge.org.uk/bgbase/vherb/bgbasevherb.php?cfg=bgbase/vherb/fulldetails.cfg&specimens_specimen__num=369514). These specimens of Ziziphus (or Pseudoziziphus!), Shortia, and Inga represent just a handful of the estimated 350,000,000 herbarium specimens deposited in the world's 3400 herbaria (Index Herbariorum, http://sciweb.nybg.org/Science2/IndexHerbariorum.asp). Collected over the past four centuries, herbarium specimens document the world's vegetation, including how it has changed in response to human activities and population expansion, and provide the basis for scientific names in the form of type specimens. Until recently, the world's herbarium specimens were under lock and key and accessible to only a small number of scientific specialists, but digitization of herbaria is now a global enterprise, and specimen data and images are emerging in digital form from herbaria around the world. Digitization—that is, electronic capture of data, including images—began decades ago in some herbaria with databasing of basic information about a specimen (scientific name, collector, date of collection, locality, etc.). Through innovations in database design and usability, application of global standards for natural history collections (e.g., DarwinCore; Wieczorek et al., 2012), improved methods for imaging herbarium specimens (e.g., Tegelberg et al., 2014), and the development of high-throughput workflows (as implemented, for example, in the Paris Herbarium; https://www.idigbio.org/sites/default/files/workshop-presentations/spnhc2014/02_SPNHC2014_chagnoux.pdf), the pace of digitization has increased dramatically. The Global Plants Initiative (GPI; https://plants.jstor.org/), a push to digitize the world's botanical type specimens, demonstrated both the global will and collaborative spirit of herbarium leaders from around the world and the feasibility of large-scale, international, collaborative digitization efforts. In many ways, GPI set the stage for the remarkable digital herbarium resources available today. Data aggregators—such as the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), the Atlas of Living Australia (ALA), the U. S. Geological Survey's portal (Biodiversity Information Serving Our Nation; BISON), and iDigBio (Integrated Digitized Biocollections, funded by the U. S. National Science Foundation (NSF); see below)—provide digital biodiversity data, including information from herbarium specimens, to the public using standardized terminology as specified in DarwinCore. Other national and regional aggregators also serve biodiversity information, and collectively these aggregators provide data that allow visualization and analysis of patterns of biodiversity in novel and exciting ways. Although decades have passed since the first herbarium records were databased and made available via the internet, it is only within the past few years that sufficient numbers of specimen records have become available for large-scale, innovative research. We are just now at the brink of new opportunities for synthetic analyses that connect digitized specimen data with other resources (phylogenetic, climatological, genomic, etc.; e.g., Soltis and Soltis, 2016) to address both novel questions in plant biology and longstanding questions from new perspectives and larger scales. iDigBio (www.idigbio.org) was founded in 2011 to collect and share the rapidly increasing volume of digitized specimen data flowing from new investments in digitization technology and workflows funded by NSF. As of this writing, iDigBio currently serves over 105 million specimen records from US and international natural history collections. Of these, approximately 50 million are herbarium records. Moreover, iDigBio serves over 22 million media records, most of which are images, with nearly 20 million representing herbarium specimens. What a resource for botanical research and education—and many more millions are in the digitization pipeline! When NSF began funding for the Advancing Digitization of Biodiversity Collections Program in 2011, the botanical communi
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- 10.1186/s12862-017-1014-z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3732/ajb.1500237 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3732/ajb.1700044 · doi:10.3732/ajb.1700044
- 10.12705/655.9 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1403376111 · DOI
- 10.1002/joc.1276 · DOI · Paper page
- Judd W. S., 1984, A new species of Ziziphus (Rhamnaceae) from Florida, Rhodora, 86, 381
- 10.1111/nph.14069 · DOI
- 10.1111/ele.12624 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1890/07-0068.1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3732/ajb.93.11.1667 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3732/apps.1500065 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/gcb.12638 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.pld.2016.12.001 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12231-017-9367-1 · DOI
- Stucky B. J. J.Deck E.Denny R. P.Guralnick R. L.Walls andJ.Yost.2016. The Plant Phenology Ontology for phenological data integration. Joint International Conference on Biomedical Ontology and BioCreative (ICBO BioCreative 2016) W12‐042016 Corvallis Oregon USA. Available athttp://icbo.cgrb.oregonstate.edu/sites/default/files/W14‐03_ICBO2016.pdf
- 10.12705/636.13 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12862-016-0827-5 · DOI
- 10.3732/ajb.1600130 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0029715 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tree.2017.03.015 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Computer Vision-Based Wood Identification: A Review
Silva, J., Bordalo, R., Pissarra, J., & de Palacios, P. (2022) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f13122041 · Cited by 37
Animal‐mediated seed dispersal: A review of study methods
Beckman, N. G., Kuprewicz, E. K., Borah, B., Bullock, J. M., Gallinat, A. S., González‐Varo, J. P., Jain, A., Lim, J. Y., Motta, C. I., Nevo, O., et al. (2026) · Applications in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1002/aps3.70043 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Soltis, P. S.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1281-1284
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2762959207
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- Licence
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (DBI‐1547229)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digitization of herbaria enables novel research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3732/ajb.1700281
- The paper
- Soltis, P. S. (2017). Digitization of herbaria enables novel research. American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1700281
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.