The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rapid diversification of the cotton genus (Gossypium: Malvaceae) revealed by analysis of sixteen nuclear and chloroplast genes
Abstract
Previous molecular phylogenetic studies have failed to resolve the branching order among the major cotton (Gossypium) lineages, and it has been unclear whether this reflects actual history (rapid radiation) or sampling properties of the genes evaluated. In this paper, we reconsider the phylogenetic relationships of diploid cotton genome groups using DNA sequences from 11 single‐copy nuclear loci (10 293 base pairs [bp]), nuclear ribosomal DNA (695 bp), and four chloroplast loci (7370 bp). Results from individual loci and combined nuclear and chloroplast DNA partitions reveal that the cotton genome groups radiated in rapid succession following the formation of the genus. Maximum likelihood analysis of nuclear synonymous sites shows that this radiation occurred within a time span equivalent to 17% of the time since the separation of Gossypium from its nearest extant relatives in the genera Kokia and Gossypioides. Chloroplast and nuclear phylogenies differ significantly with respect to resolution of the basal divergence in the genus and to interrelationships among African cottons. This incongruence is due to limited character evolution in cpDNA and either previously unsuspected hybridization or unreliable phylogenetic performance of the cpDNA characters. This study highlights the necessity of using multiple, independent data sets for resolving phylogenetic relationships of rapidly diverged lineages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dating of the human–ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA.
Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H., & Yano, T.-A. (1985) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02101694 · Cited by 8,687
Cited by
Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference
Álvarez, I., & Wendel, J. F. (2003) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/s1055-7903(03)00208-2 · Cited by 1,877
Self-citationReconstructing patterns of reticulate evolution in plants
Linder, C. R., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2004) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.91.10.1700 · Cited by 434
Rate Variation Among Nuclear Genes and the Age of Polyploidy in Gossypium
Senchina, D. S. (2003) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msg065 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Cronn, R. C., Small, R. L., Haselkorn, T., & Wendel, J. F.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 707-725
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2101851879
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid diversification of the cotton genus (Gossypium: Malvaceae) revealed by analysis of sixteen nuclear and chloroplast genes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3732/ajb.89.4.707
- The paper
- Cronn, R. C., Small, R. L., Haselkorn, T., & Wendel, J. F. (2002). Rapid diversification of the cotton genus (Gossypium: Malvaceae) revealed by analysis of sixteen nuclear and chloroplast genes. American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.4.707
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.