The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconstructing patterns of reticulate evolution in plants
Open accessAbstract
Until recently, rigorously reconstructing the many hybrid speciation events in plants has not been practical because of the limited number of molecular markers available for plant phylogenetic reconstruction and the lack of good, biologically based methods for inferring reticulation (network) events. This situation should change rapidly with the development of multiple nuclear markers for phylogenetic reconstruction and new methods for reconstructing reticulate evolution. These developments will necessitate a much greater incorporation of population genetics into phylogenetic reconstruction than has been common. Population genetic events such as gene duplication coupled with lineage sorting and meiotic and sexual recombination have always had the potential to affect phylogenetic inference. For tree reconstruction, these problems are usually minimized by using uniparental markers and nuclear markers that undergo rapid concerted evolution. Because reconstruction of reticulate speciation events will require nuclear markers that lack these characteristics, effects of population genetics on phylogenetic inference will need to be addressed directly. Current models and methods that allow hybrid speciation to be detected and reconstructed are discussed, with a focus on how lineage sorting and meiotic and sexual recombination affect network reconstruction. Approaches that would allow inference of phylogenetic networks in their presence are suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E., & Quattro, J. M. (1992) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/131.2.479 · Cited by 13,929
Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies
Bandelt, H. J., Forster, P., & Rohl, A. (1999) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026036 · Cited by 11,742
TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies
Clement, M., Posada, D., & Crandall, K. A. (2000) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01020.x · Cited by 9,861
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
Maddison, W. P. (1997) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/46.3.523 · Cited by 3,021
Variation and Evolution in Plants
Stebbins, G. L. (1950) · doi:10.7312/steb94536 · Cited by 2,704
Comparison of phylogenetic trees
Robinson, D. F., & Foulds, L. R. (1981) · Mathematical Biosciences · doi:10.1016/0025-5564(81)90043-2 · Cited by 2,701
Moore, D. S., Hillis, D. M., Moritz, C., & Mable, B. K. (1996) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1447682 · Cited by 2,371
Polyploid incidence and evolution
Otto, S. P., & Whitton, J. (2000) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.401 · Cited by 2,363
DNA methylation and epigenetic inheritance
Holliday, R. (1990) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1990.0015 · Cited by 2,279
Cited by
Synthesis of phylogeny and taxonomy into a comprehensive tree of life
Hinchliff, C. E., Smith, S. A., Allman, J. F., Burleigh, J. G., Chaudhary, R., Coghill, L. M., Crandall, K. A., Deng, J., Drew, B. T., Gazis, R., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1423041112 · Cited by 788
A genomic view of introgression and hybrid speciation
Baack, E. J., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2007) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2007.09.001 · Cited by 437
Self-citationA Statistical Approach for Distinguishing Hybridization and Incomplete Lineage Sorting
Joly, S., McLenachan, P. A., & Lockhart, P. J. (2009) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/600082 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Linder, C. R., & Rieseberg, L. H.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1700-1708
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2120256177
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 75
- FWCI
- 18.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconstructing patterns of reticulate evolution in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3732/ajb.91.10.1700
- The paper
- Linder, C. R., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2004). Reconstructing patterns of reticulate evolution in plants. American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.91.10.1700
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.