The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the micromechanical design of plant cell walls
Abstract
Plants are hierarchically organized in a way that their macroscopic properties emerge from their micro‐ and nanostructural level. Hence, micromechanical investigations, which focus on the mechanical design of plant cell walls, are well suited for elucidating the details of the relationship between plant form and function. However, due to the complex nature of primary and secondary cell walls, micromechanical tests on the entire structure cannot provide exact values for polymer properties but must be targeted at the general mechanisms of cell wall deformation and polymer interaction. The success of micromechanical examinations depends on well‐considered specimen selection and/or sample pretreatment as well as appropriate experimental setups. Making use of structural differences by taking advantage of the natural variability in plant tissue and cell structure, adaptation strategies can be analyzed at the micro‐ and nanoscale. Targeted genetic and enzymatic treatments can be utilized to specifically modify individual polymers without degrading the structural integrity of the cell wall. The mechanical properties of such artificial systems reveal the functional roles of individual polymers for a better understanding of the mechanical interactions within the cell wall assembly. In terms of testing methodology, in situ methods that combine micromechanical testing with structural and chemical analyses are particularly well suited for the study of the basic structure–property relationships in plant design. The micromechanical approaches reviewed here are not exhaustive, but they do provide a reasonably comprehensive overview of the methodology with which the general mechanisms underlying the functionality of plant micro‐ and nanostructure can be explored without destroying the entire cell wall.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wood: Chemistry, ultrastructure, reactions
(1983) · doi:10.1515/9783110839654 · Cited by 2,846
Elastic modulus and stress-transfer properties of tunicate cellulose whiskers
Šturcová, A., Davies, G. R., & Eichhorn, S. J. (2005) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm049291k · Cited by 953
Cited by
Additive manufacturing of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: Processing and prospects
Balla, V. K., Kate, K. H., Satyavolu, J., Singh, P., & Tadimeti, J. G. D. (2019) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106956 · Cited by 580
The hygroscopic behavior of plant fibers: a review
Célino, A., Fréour, S., Jacquemin, F., & Casari, P. (2014) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2013.00043 · Cited by 461
Cavalier, D. M., Lerouxel, O., Neumetzler, L., Yamauchi, K., Reinecke, A., Freshour, G., Zabotina, O. A., Hahn, M. G., Burgert, I., Pauly, M., et al. (2008) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.108.059873 · Cited by 444
Self-citationMichel, G., Tonon, T., Scornet, D., Cock, J. M., & Kloareg, B. (2010) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03374.x · Cited by 419
Three-dimensional printing of hierarchical liquid-crystal-polymer structures
Gantenbein, S., Masania, K., Woigk, W., Sesseg, J. P. W., Tervoort, T. A., & Studart, A. R. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0474-7 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Burgert, I.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1391-1401
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2166820667
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring the micromechanical design of plant cell walls. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3732/ajb.93.10.1391
- The paper
- Burgert, I. (2006). Exploring the micromechanical design of plant cell walls. American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.93.10.1391
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.