The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The hygroscopic behavior of plant fibers: a review
Open accessAbstract
Environmental concern has resulted in a renewed interest in bio-based materials. Among them, plant fibers are perceived as an environmentally friendly substitute to glass fibers for the reinforcement of composites, particularly in automotive engineering. Due to their wide availability, low cost, low density, high-specific mechanical properties, and eco-friendly image, they are increasingly being employed as reinforcements in polymer matrix composites. Indeed, their complex microstructure as a composite material makes plant fiber a really interesting and challenging subject to study. Research subjects about such fibers are abundant because there are always some issues to prevent their use at large scale (poor adhesion, variability, low thermal resistance, hydrophilic behavior). The choice of natural fibers rather than glass fibers as filler yields a change of the final properties of the composite. One of the most relevant differences between the two kinds of fiber is their response to humidity. Actually, glass fibers are considered as hydrophobic whereas plant fibers have a pronounced hydrophilic behavior. Composite materials are often submitted to variable climatic conditions during their lifetime, including unsteady hygroscopic conditions. However, in humid conditions, strong hydrophilic behavior of such reinforcing fibers leads to high level of moisture absorption in wet environments. This results in the structural modification of the fibers and an evolution of their mechanical properties together with the composites in which they are fitted in. Thereby, the understanding of these moisture absorption mechanisms as well as the influence of water on the final properties of these fibers and their composites is of great interest to get a better control of such new biomaterials. This is the topic of this review paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
JOHN, M., & THOMAS, S. (2008) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.05.040 · Cited by 2,453
Experimental determination of the elastic modulus of crystalline regions in oriented polymers
Sakurada, I., Nukushina, Y., & Ito, T. (1962) · Journal of Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/pol.1962.1205716551 · Cited by 883
Sugiyama, J., Vuong, R., & Chanzy, H. (1991) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00014a033 · Cited by 791
Islam, M. S., Pickering, K. L., & Foreman, N. J. (2010) · Polymer Degradation and Stability · doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.10.010 · Cited by 163
Asbestos minerals in modern technology
Speil, S., & Leineweber, J. P. (1969) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/0013-9351(69)90036-x · Cited by 134
Cited by
Natural fibres: Can they replace glass in fibre reinforced plastics?
Wambua, P., Ivens, J., & Verpoest, I. (2003) · Composites Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0266-3538(03)00096-4 · Cited by 2,676
Abdul Khalil, H. P. S., Davoudpour, Y., Saurabh, C. K., Hossain, M. S., Adnan, A. S., Dungani, R., Paridah, M. T., Islam Sarker, M. Z., Fazita, M. R. N., Syakir, M. I., et al. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.072 · Cited by 306
Jagadeesh, P., Puttegowda, M., Mavinkere Rangappa, S., & Siengchin, S. (2021) · Polymer Composites · doi:10.1002/pc.26312 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Célino, A., Fréour, S., Jacquemin, F., & Casari, P.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Chemistry
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 43-43
- ISSN
- 2296-2646 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079107372
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 16.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The hygroscopic behavior of plant fibers: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fchem.2013.00043
- The paper
- Célino, A., Fréour, S., Jacquemin, F., & Casari, P. (2014). The hygroscopic behavior of plant fibers: a review. Frontiers in Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2013.00043
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.