The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A unified hypothesis of mechanoperception in plants
Abstract
The perception of mechanical stimuli in the environment is crucial to the survival of all living organisms. Recent advances have led to the proposal of a plant‐specific mechanosensory network within plant cells that is similar to the previously described network in animal systems. This sensory network is the basis for a unifying hypothesis, which may account for the perception of numerous mechanical signals including gravitropic, thigmomorphic, thigmotropic, self‐loading, growth strains, turgor pressure, xylem pressure potential, and sound. The current state of our knowledge of a mechanosensory network in plants is reviewed, and two mechanoreceptor models are considered: a plasmodesmata‐based cytoskeleton–plasma membrane–cell wall (CPMCW) network vs. stretch‐activated ion channels. Post‐mechanosensory physiological responses to mechanical stresses are also reviewed, and future research directions in the area of mechanoperception and response are recommended.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Abeles, F. B. (1973) · Cited by 2,876
Davies, P. J. (1993) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90043-p · Cited by 1,781
The Power of Movement in Plants
Darwin, C., & Darwin, F. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511693670 · Cited by 1,533
Ethylene: A Gaseous Signal Molecule in Plants
Bleecker, A. B., & Kende, H. (2000) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.16.1.1 · Cited by 1,472
Lateral relocation of auxin efflux regulator PIN3 mediates tropism in Arabidopsis
Friml, J., Wiśniewska, J., Benková, E., Mendgen, K., & Palme, K. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415806a · Cited by 1,426
Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology
Ingber, D. E. (2003) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.00359 · Cited by 1,265
Mechanical Design in Organisms
Wainwright, S. A., Biggs, W. D., Currey, J. D., & Gosline, J. M. (2020) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv143mdjg · Cited by 1,263
McMahon, T. (1973) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.179.4079.1201 · Cited by 1,175
Knight, M. R., Campbell, A. K., Smith, S. M., & Trewavas, A. J. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/352524a0 · Cited by 1,169
Plant biomechanics: an engineering approach to plant form and function
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-3824 · Cited by 1,121
Cited by
Kurusu, T., Nishikawa, D., Yamazaki, Y., Gotoh, M., Nakano, M., Hamada, H., Yamanaka, T., Iida, K., Nakagawa, Y., Saji, H., et al. (2012) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2229-12-11 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Telewski, F. W.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1466-1476
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2136674372
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 17.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A unified hypothesis of mechanoperception in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3732/ajb.93.10.1466
- The paper
- Telewski, F. W. (2006). A unified hypothesis of mechanoperception in plants. American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.93.10.1466
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.