The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Civic Activity and Well-Being Among First-Year College Students
Open accessAbstract
Institutions of higher education face the challenge of fostering academic success and well-being among students at a time when depression and substance abuse are on the rise within undergraduate populations. Evidence suggests that service-learning and community service promote undergraduate well-being in relation to substance use and psychological health. The study discussed in this article examined the association between civic activity and several aspects of well-being as it relates specifically to young adults during the first year of college. Results suggest that engaging in civic activities during the high school years or during the first year of college may serve to promote different aspects of well-being among first-year undergraduate students.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social engagement and voting reduced various risky health behaviors among American youth.
“Social engagement (Ballard et al., 2019 ; Nicotera et al., 2015 ) and voting (Ballard et al., 2019) reduced various risky health behaviors among American youth.”
From The Effect of Civic Engagement on Different Dimensions of Well-Being in Youth: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as Nicotera et al., 2015
College self-efficacy was positively associated with social engagement among American undergraduate students.
“Nico -tera et al. (2015 ) understood college self-efficacy as a facet of well-being and found a positive association with social engagement among American undergraduate stu -dents.”
From The Effect of Civic Engagement on Different Dimensions of Well-Being in Youth: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as Nicotera et al., 2015
Some reviewed studies used a composite of well-being dimensions as their dependent variable.
“some studies used the composite of these dimensions as their dependent variable (e.g., Hayhurst et al., 2019 ; Nicotera et al., 2015 )”
From The Effect of Civic Engagement on Different Dimensions of Well-Being in Youth: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as Nicotera et al., 2015
Citations
Cites
Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in Organizational Behavior
Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2006) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.406 · Cited by 961
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Effect of Civic Engagement on Different Dimensions of Well-Being in Youth: A Scoping Review
Mužík, M., Šerek, J., & Juhová, D. S. (2025) · Adolescent Research Review · doi:10.1007/s40894-024-00239-x · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Nicotera, N., Brewer, S., & Veeh, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Denver (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nicotera, Nicole
- Venue
- International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement
- Published
- 2015-12-31
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2374-9466 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2198603358
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 6.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Service-Learning and Community Engagement
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Youth Development and Social Support
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Keywords
- citizen participation, student well-being, first-year college students, service-learning, community service, depression, substance use, mental health, young adults
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
