Cited by 7Artificial Intelligence in EducationOnline Learning and AnalyticsEducational Innovations and Challenges

The Good, The Bad and The Ugly: AI in the higher education

Open access
Popkhadze, Nino·2021·Hallinnon Tutkimus

Abstract

Higher education institutions face the Janus dilemma, on the one hand, universities are asked to be more open, transparent, and easily accessible, so they can be better scrutinized by the public. On the other, they need to limit transparency and guard privacy. The article explores how AI slowly but heavily penetrates the domain of the higher education institutions; it provides various applications of AI in the domain of higher education. This paper argues that AI, big data, and learning analytics can become a powerful tool for advancing higher education institutions further, but at the same time, AI can have a detrimental effect without a vigilant eye. The paper does not aim to minimize the value and virtue of AI, rather problematize the implications and promote conscious decision-making. The article aims to stimulate the discussion among the relevant stakeholders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.37450/ht.107896

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [8]8. Gagliardi, Jonathan S. (2018). The Analutics Revolution in Higher Education. In Swing, Randy L., Parnell, Amelia R., Gagliardi, Jonathan S. & Carpenter-Hubin, Julia (Eds.), The analytics revolution in higher education : big data, or- ganizational learning, and student success (1 st ed., pp. 1-14). Stylus Publishing, LLC.
  2. [14]14. Klein, Carrie, Lester, Jaime, Rangwala, Huzefa & Johri, Aditya (2020). Learning Analytics for Learning Assessment: Complexities in Efficacy, Implementation, and Broad Use. In Karen L. & Zheng, Henry Y (Eds.), Big Data on campus: Data-informed decision making in higher educa- tion. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  3. [15]15. Knox, Dan (2010). A good horse runs at the shadow of the whip: Surveillance and organi- zational trust in online learning environments. Canadian Journal of Media Studies. Retrieved from http://cjms.fims.uwo.ca/issues/07-01/ dKnoxAGoodHorseFinal.pdf
  4. [16]16. Lane, Jason E. (2014). Building a Smarter University: Big Data, Innovation, and Analytics. State University of New York Press.
  5. [33]33. Volkwein, Fredericks J., Liu, Ying J. & Woodell, James (2012). The structure and functions of in- stitutional research offices. In Howard Richard D., McLaughlin Gerald W. & Knight WILLIAM E. (Eds), The handbook of institutional research (pp. 22-39).
  6. [34]34. Hoboken, N.J. John Wiley & Sons.
  7. [35]35. Webber, Karen L. & Zheng, Henry Y. (2020). Chapter 1-1. In Webber, Karen L. & Zheng, (Eds.), Data analytics in higher education (pp. 1-33). Johns Hopkins University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Popkhadze, N.
Affiliations
Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT)
Corresponding author
Popkhadze, Nino
Venue
Hallinnon Tutkimus
Published
2021-11-18
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
254-263
ISSN
  • 0359-6680 (ISSN-L)
  • 2343-4309
OpenAlex
W3215854883
Cited by
7
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Hallinnon Tutkimus (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Challenges
Keywords
artificial intelligence in higher education, learning analytics, big data, transparency, privacy, open access, ethical implications of AI, higher education institutions, conscious decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review