The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Practice guidelines for the pathological diagnosis of primary liver cancer: 2015 update
Open accessAbstract
In 2010, a panel of Chinese pathologists reported the first expert consensus for the pathological diagnosis of primary liver cancers to address the many contradictions and inconsistencies in the pathological characteristics and diagnostic criteria for PLC. Since then considerable clinicopathological studies have been conducted globally, prompting us to update the practice guidelines for the pathological diagnosis of PLC. In April 18, 2014, a Guideline Committee consisting of 40 specialists from seven Chinese Societies (including Chinese Society of Liver Cancer, Chinese Anti-Cancer Association; Liver Cancer Study Group, Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association; Chinese Society of Pathology, Chinese Anti-Cancer Association; Digestive Disease Group, Chinese Society of Pathology, Chinese Medical Association; Chinese Society of Surgery, Chinese Medical Association; Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Chinese Anti-Cancer Association; Pathological Group of Hepatobiliary Tumor and Liver Transplantation, Chinese Society of Pathology, Chinese Medical Association) was created for the formulation of the first guidelines for the standardization of the pathological diagnosis of PLC, mainly focusing on the following topics: gross specimen sampling, concepts and diagnostic criteria of small hepatocellular carcinoma (SHCC), microvascular invasion (MVI), satellite nodules, and immunohistochemical and molecular diagnosis. The present updated guidelines are reflective of current clinicopathological studies, and include a novel 7-point baseline sampling protocol, which stipulate that at least four tissue specimens should be sampled at the junction of the tumor and adjacent liver tissues in a 1:1 ratio at the 12, 3, 6 and 9 o'clock reference positions. For the purposes of molecular pathological examination, at least one specimen should be sampled at the intratumoral zone, but more specimens should be sampled for tumors harboring different textures or colors. Specimens should be sampled at both adjacent and distant peritumoral liver tissues or the tumor margin in order to observe MVI, satellite nodules and dysplastic foci/nodules distributed throughout the background liver tissues. Complete sampling of whole SHCC ≤ 3 cm should be performed to assess its biological behavior, and in clinical practice, therapeutic borders should be also preserved, even in SHCC. The diagnostic criteria of MVI and satellite nodules, immunohistochemical panels, as well as molecular diagnostic principles, such as clonal typing, for recurrent HCC and multinodule HCC were also proposed and recommended. The standardized process of pathological examination is aimed at ensuring the accuracy of pathological PLC diagnoses as well as providing a valuable frame of reference for the clinical assessment of tumor invasive potential, the risk of postoperative recurrence, long-term survival, and the development of individualized treatment regimens. The updated guidelines could ensure the accuracy of pathological diagnoses of PLC, and provide a valuable frame of reference for its clinical assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global cancer statistics, 2012
Torre, L. A., Bray, F., Siegel, R. L., Ferlay, J., Lortet‐Tieulent, J., & Jemal, A. (2015) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21262 · Cited by 26,850
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma
Galle, P. R., Forner, A., Llovet, J. M., Mazzaferro, V., Piscaglia, F., Raoul, J.-L., Schirmacher, P., & Vilgrain, V. (2018) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019 · Cited by 11,406
EASL–EORTC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma
European Association for the Study of the Liver, & European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (2012) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2011.12.001 · Cited by 5,218
Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis
Ishak, K., Baptista, A., Bianchi, L., Callea, F., De Groote, J., Gudat, F., Denk, H., Desmet, V., Korb, G., MacSween, R. N. M., et al. (1995) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/0168-8278(95)80226-6 · Cited by 5,029
An Algorithm for the Grading of Activity in Chronic Hepatitis C
Bedossa, P., & Poynard, T. (1996) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.510240201 · Cited by 4,088
Knodell, R. G., Ishak, K. G., Black, W. C., Chen, T. S., Craig, R., Kaplowitz, N., Kiernan, T. W., & Wollman, J. (1981) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.1840010511 · Cited by 3,522
Hematological Problems in Pediatric Intensive Care
Revel-Vilk, S., Cox, P., Robitaille, N., & Blanchette, V. (2014) · Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1159/000350346 · Cited by 3,508
Classification of chronic hepatitis: Diagnosis, grading and staging
Desmet, V. J., Gerber, M., Hoofnagle, J. H., Manns, M., & Scheuer, P. J. (1994) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.1840190629 · Cited by 2,593
Rockey, D. C., Caldwell, S. H., Goodman, Z. D., Nelson, R. C., & Smith, A. D. (2009) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.22742 · Cited by 1,997
Razumilava, N., & Gores, G. J. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61903-0 · Cited by 1,729
Cited by
Wang, K., Xiang, Y.-J., Yu, H.-M., Cheng, Y.-Q., Liu, Z.-H., Qin, Y.-Y., Shi, J., Guo, W.-X., Lu, C.-D., Zheng, Y.-X., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02786-7 · Cited by 142
Cai, Y., Fu, Y., Liu, C., Wang, X., You, P., Li, X., Song, Y., Mu, X., Fang, T., Yang, Y., et al. (2022) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-022-04625-y · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Cong, W.-M., Bu, H., Chen, J., Dong, H., Zhu, Y.-Y., Feng, L.-H., Chen, J., & Committee, G.
- Venue
- World Journal of Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 9279
- ISSN
- 1007-9327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2552389495
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 9.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Practice guidelines for the pathological diagnosis of primary liver cancer: 2015 update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3748/wjg.v22.i42.9279
- The paper
- Cong, W.-M., Bu, H., Chen, J., Dong, H., Zhu, Y.-Y., Feng, L.-H., Chen, J., & Committee, G. (2016). Practice guidelines for the pathological diagnosis of primary liver cancer: 2015 update. World Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i42.9279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.