Cited by 62Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismMemory Processes and Influences

The computational implementation of the landscape model: Modeling inferential processes and memory representations of text comprehension

Open access
Tzeng, Yuhtsuen, van den Broek, Paul, Kendeou, Panayiota, Lee, Chengyuan·2005·Behavior Research Methods

Abstract

The complexity of text comprehension demands a computational approach to describe the cognitive processes involved. In this article, we present the computational implementation of the landscape model of reading. This model captures both on-line comprehension processes during reading and the off-line memory representation after reading is completed, incorporating both memory-based and coherence-based mechanisms of comprehension. The overall architecture and specific parameters of the program are described, and a running example is provided. Several studies comparing computational and behavioral data indicate that the implemented model is able to account for cycle-by-cycle comprehension processes and memory for a variety of text types and reading situations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03192695

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Memory encoding of linguistic situation models may not be a result of an 'encoding' operation but may instead be a reflection of the activation state at the end of comprehension, readable from lateral temporal regions and reflecting the strength of a memory trace.

    “For example, memory encoding of linguistic situation models may not be a result of an 'encoding' operation but just be a reflection of the activation state at the end of comprehension, which can be read off from lateral temporal regions and reflects the strength of a memory trace (consistent with several functional theories, e.g., Tzeng et al., 2005).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Goldman, S. R., Golden, R., & van den Broek, P. (in press). Why are computational models of text comprehension useful? In F. Schmal- hofer & C. Perfetti (Eds.), Higher level language processes in the brain. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  2. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Towards a model of text com- prehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
  3. Molinari, C. (2004). Inference of fictional characters' emotions: Im- plementation in the landscape computational model of reading com- prehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  4. Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehen- sion in elementary school children. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New di- rections in discourse processing (Vol. 2, pp. 53-120). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  5. van den Broek, P., Risden, K., & Husebye-Hartmann, E. (1995). The role of readers' standards of coherence in the generation of in- ferences during reading. In E. P. Lorch & E. J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 353-373). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  6. van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (1999). The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the on-line con- struction of a memory representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71-98). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  7. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse com- prehension. New York: Academic Press.

Authors
Tzeng, Y., van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., & Lee, C.
Affiliations
  • National Chung Cheng University (TW)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • National Kaohsiung Normal University (TW)
Venue
Behavior Research Methods
Published
2005-05
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
277-286
ISSN
  • 1554-351X (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-3528
OpenAlex
W1973324733
Cited by
62
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Research Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Minnesota (HD-07151)
  • Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences
  • National Science Council
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD07151, T32HD007151)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
text comprehension, computational modeling of reading, memory representation, reading comprehension models
MeSH terms
Cognition, Humans, Memory, Reading, Software, User-Computer Interface

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review