The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Audio–visual simultaneity judgments
Open accessAbstract
The relative spatiotemporal correspondence between sensory events affects multisensory integration across a variety of species; integration is maximal when stimuli in different sensory modalities are presented from approximately the same position at about the same time. In the present study, we investigated the influence of spatial and temporal factors on audio-visual simultaneity perception in humans. Participants made unspeeded simultaneous versus successive discrimination responses to pairs of auditory and visual stimuli presented at varying stimulus onset asynchronies from either the same or different spatial positions using either the method of constant stimuli (Experiments 1 and 2) or psychophysical staircases (Experiment 3). The participants in all three experiments were more likely to report the stimuli as being simultaneous when they originated from the same spatial position than when they came from different positions, demonstrating that the apparent perception of multisensory simultaneity is dependent on the relative spatial position from which stimuli are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“Further, although Ring and Brener (2018) argue that humans are able to judge very precisely (within 20 ms) whether two stimuli in different modalities are simultaneous (Zampini et al., 2005), a sizeable portion of variance in this task appears to be accounted for by the ability to determine synchronicity of (non-interoceptive) cross-modal signals (Knapp et al., 1997).”
From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Zampini et al., 2005
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 · Cited by 21,230
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-4365 · Cited by 1,897
Tutorial on maximum likelihood estimation
Myung, I. J. (2003) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2496(02)00028-7 · Cited by 1,802
Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy.
Welch, R. B., & Warren, D. H. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.638 · Cited by 1,176
PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions
Taylor, M. M., & Creelman, C. D. (1967) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1910407 · Cited by 1,173
The evolution of brain activation during temporal processing
Rao, S. M., Mayer, A. R., & Harrington, D. L. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/85191 · Cited by 853
Fraisse, P. (1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 825
Crossmodal Space and Crossmodal Attention
(2004) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524861.001.0001 · Cited by 801
Perceived order in different sense modalities.
Hirsh, I. J., & Sherrick, C. E. (1961) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0045283 · Cited by 700
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Bertelson, P. (1998). Starting from the ventriloquist: The perception of multimodal events. In M. Sabourin, F. I. M. Craik, & M. Robert (Eds.),Advances in psychological science: Vol. 2. Biological and cognitive aspects (pp. 419–439). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
- Guinzberg, R. L. (1928). È possibile l’apprendimento di sensazioni eterogenee come perfettamente simultanee?[Is it possible to learn that heterogeneous sensations are perfectly simultaneous?] Archivi Italiani di Psicologia,6, 103–114.
- Michotte, A. (1912). Nouvelles recherches sur la simultanéité apparente d’impressions disparates périodiques (expérience de complication) [New research on the apparent simultaneity of periodic heterogeneous stimuli (complication situation)].Annales de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie,1, 571–663.
- Raizada, R. D. S., &Poldrack, R. A. (2001). Event-related fMRI of audio—visual simultaneity perception.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,14 (Suppl.), 172.
- Rihs, S. (1995). The influence of audio on perceived picture quality and subjective audio—visual delay tolerance. In R. Hamberg & H. de Ridder (Eds.),Proceedings of the MOSAIC workshop: Advanced methods for the evaluation of television picture quality (pp. 133-137). Eindhoven.
- Scheier, C. R., Nijhawan, R., &Shimojo, S. (1999). Sound alters visual temporal resolution.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,40, S792.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Temporal window of integration in auditory-visual speech perception
van Wassenhove, V., Grant, K. W., & Poeppel, D. (2006) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.001 · Cited by 649
Perception of intersensory synchrony: A tutorial review
Vroomen, J., & Keetels, M. (2010) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/app.72.4.871 · Cited by 512
Perceptual Training Narrows the Temporal Window of Multisensory Binding
Powers, A. R., Hillock‐Dunn, A., & Wallace, M. T. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3501-09.2009 · Cited by 355
Wallace, M. T., & Stevenson, R. A. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.005 · Cited by 361
Spence, C. J., & Parise, C. (2009) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.001 · Cited by 296
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zampini, M., Guest, S., Shore, D. I., & Spence, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Trento (IT)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- McMaster University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Zampini, Massimiliano
- Venue
- Perception & Psychophysics
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 531-544
- ISSN
- 0031-5117 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5962
- OpenAlex
- W2013674599
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 13.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Perception & Psychophysics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Oxford
- Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- multisensory integration, stimulus onset asynchrony, spatial location, temporal correspondence, cross-modal perception
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Auditory Perception, Cues, Humans, Judgment, Space Perception, Time Factors, Visual Acuity, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
