The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing
Open accessAbstract
It is widely assumed that 5 participants suffice for usability testing. In this study, 60 users were tested and random sets of 5 or more were sampled from the whole, to demonstrate the risks of using only 5 participants and the benefits of using more. Some of the randomly selected sets of 5 participants found 99% of the problems; other sets found only 55%. With 10 users, the lowest percentage of problems revealed by any one set was increased to 80%, and with 20 users, to 95%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Purposive sampling was used to select 10 individuals 43 with at least 50% of the following characteristics: 65þ years old, individuals of diverse race/ethnicity, male, education less than college, and taking at least 3 medications.”
From A chatbot for hypertension self-management support: user-centered design, development, and usability testing (2023) · cites this paper as [43]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Prior research suggests that our sample size is adequate for usability testing, 43”
From A chatbot for hypertension self-management support: user-centered design, development, and usability testing (2023) · cites this paper as [43]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Ten participants were chosen at each stage of the recruitment process—the mean percentage of problems identified in usability studies rises from 85% to 95% when the number of participants increases from 5 to 10 [36].”
From A user-centred design framework for mHealth (2020) · cites this paper as [36]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Our sample size was chosen in line with prior work around formative testing for usability [19,43]: our goal is to explore the frst,”
From Why Johnny Can’t Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM Prompts (2023) · cites this paper as [19]
In the citing paper
“This may be reasonable, given that simulations suggest that 10 users will identify a minimum of 80 % of the problems with the technology during usability testing, and 20 users will identify 95 % of the problems [42].”
From Maximising the impact of qualitative research in feasibility studies for randomised controlled trials: guidance for researchers (2015) · cites this paper as [42]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1993) · Cited by 9,879
(1993) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-21512-1 · Cited by 5,552
Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents
REASON, J. T. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315543543 · Cited by 4,523
A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems
Nielsen, J., & Landauer, T. K. (1993) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '93 · doi:10.1145/169059.169166 · Cited by 1,961
Refining the Test Phase of Usability Evaluation: How Many Subjects Is Enough?
Virzi, R. A. (1992) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872089203400407 · Cited by 1,269
Spool, J. M., & Schroeder, W. (2001) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/634067.634236 · Cited by 162
Why and when five test users aren’t enough
Woolrych, A., & Cockton, G. (2001) · Cited by 99
How many users does it take to change a Web site?
Hudson, W. (2001) · ACM SIGCHI Bulletin · doi:10.1145/967222.967230 · Cited by 9
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Grosvenor, L. (1999).Software usability: Challenging the myths and assumptions in an emerging field. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Texas, Austin.
- Wentworth, R. J. (1996, March).Group chairman’s factual report (American Airlines Flight 965). Washington, DC: National Transportation Safety Board, Office of Aviation Safety.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,000
Eco-Cultural Design Assessment Framework and Tool for Sustainable Housing Schemes
Qtaishat, Y., Adeyeye, K., & Emmitt, S. (2020) · Urban Science · doi:10.3390/urbansci4040065 · Cited by 9
UI/UX Design of Educational Game for Earthquake Mitigation
Belinda, N. A., Linawati, L., & Saputra, K. O. (2020) · IEEE International Women in Engineering (WIE) Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (WIECON-ECE) · doi:10.1109/wiecon-ece52138.2020.9398019 · Cited by 9
Evaluation of eGovernment websites usability in Jordan
Fawwaz, A., & Methqal, B. (2012) · Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) · Cited by 10
Lightfoot, C. J., Wilkinson, T. J., Vadaszy, N., Graham-Brown, M. P. M., Davies, M. J., Yates, T. E., & Smith, A. C. (2024) · Journal of Renal Care · doi:10.1111/jorc.12488 · Cited by 8
Designing for AI Transparency in Public Services: A User-Centred Study of Citizens’ Preferences
Schmager, S., Gupta, S., Pappas, I. O., & Vassilakopoulou, P. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-61315-9_17 · Cited by 9
Dasari, S., Gopinath, B., Gaulke, C. J., Patel, S., Merali, K. K., Kumar, A., & Acharya, S. (2024) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/56605 · Cited by 8
Muheim, J., Hotz, I., Kübler, F., Herren, S., Sollereder, S., Kruszewski, K., Martin‐Niedecken, A. L., Schättin, A., Behrendt, F., Böckler, S., et al. (2024) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-024-05617-7 · Cited by 8
Bonotis, P., Angelidis, P., & Natsiavas, P. (2025) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/57342 · Cited by 8
Carrión-Toro, M., Martinez, D. M., Santórum, M., Bernal, L., Galindo-Losada, J., Aguilar, J., & Acosta-Vargas, P. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app151810084 · Cited by 8
Viswanathan, S., Omidvar-Tehrani, B., & Renders, J.-M. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3501912 · Cited by 8
Beaudry, G. M., Canal‐Rivero, M., Ou, J., Matharu, J., Fazel, S., & Yu, R. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.871213 · Cited by 9
Black-box testing on web-GIS of forest health monitoring using equivalence partitioning techniques
Pangestu, A. Y., Safe’i, R., Darmawan, A., Kaskoyo, H., & Andrian, R. (2022) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0104748 · Cited by 8
Hofstetter, S., Ritter‐Herschbach, M., Behr, D., & Jahn, P. (2023) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/47025 · Cited by 8
Public Services, Community, and Its Involvement in Decision-Making for Local Development
Draçi, P., & Laska, A. (2023) · Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.56345/ijrdv10n102 · Cited by 8
Tan, B. L., Nair, R., Duggal, M. S., Aishworiya, R., & Tong, H. J. (2023) · Autism · doi:10.1177/13623613231188768 · Cited by 9
Lunde, P., Skoglund, G., Olsen, C. F., Hilde, G., Bong, W. K., & Nilsson, B. B. (2023) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/48950 · Cited by 10
Candidori, S., Dozio, N., Osouli, K., Graziosi, S., Zanini, A. A., Costantino, M. L., & Gaetano, F. D. (2024) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104223 · Cited by 8
Experiments as Code and its application to VR studies in human-building interaction
Aguilar, L., Gath-Morad, M., Grübel, J., Ermatinger, J., Zhao, H., Wehrli, S., Sumner, R. W., Zhang, C., Helbing, D., & Hölscher, C. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-60791-3 · Cited by 13
What sample sizes do we need? Part 1: summative studies
Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802308-2.00006-0 · Cited by 8
A Framework for Virtual Reality Training to Improve Public Speaking
Pellett, K., & Zaidi, S. F. M. (2019) · ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST) · doi:10.1145/3359996.3364727 · Cited by 8
An Ontology-Based Thermal Comfort Management System In Smart Buildings
Orozco, A. T., Mouakher, A., Sassi, I. B., & Nicolle, C. (2019) · International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems (MEDES) · doi:10.1145/3297662.3365824 · Cited by 8
FERRARI: an efficient framework for visual exploratory subgraph search in graph databases
Wang, C., Xie, M., Bhowmick, S. S., Choi, B. K. K., Xiao, X., & Zhou, S. (2020) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s00778-020-00601-0 · Cited by 8
Find A Loo: an app for sanitation governance
Biswas, R., Arya, K., Fernandes, V., & Shah, T. (2020) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2020.1716038 · Cited by 8
A Federated Online Search Tool for Biospecimens (Sample Locator): Usability Study
Schüttler, C., Huth, V., von Jagwitz-Biegnitz, M., Lablans, M., Prokosch, H., & Griebel, L. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/17739 · Cited by 8
Zhong, S., Yu, R., Cornish, R., Wang, X., Fazel, S., FoVOx group, Chen, C., Li, C., Zhang, D., Wang, J., et al. (2021) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-021-03115-3 · Cited by 8
Usability of a Co-designed eHealth Prototype for Caregivers: Combination Study of Three Frameworks
Tremblay, M., Latulippe, K., Guay, M., Provencher, V., Giguere, A. M. C., Poulin, V., Dubé, V., & Giroux, D. (2021) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/26532 · Cited by 8
Khan, M. S., Charissis, V., Godsiff, P., Wood, Z., Falah, J., Alfalah, S. F. M., & Harrison, D. K. (2022) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti6030021 · Cited by 8
Cole, A. C., Khasawneh, A., Adapa, K., Mazur, L. M., & Richardson, D. R. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05654-3_14 · Cited by 8
Software Quality Testing In Mobile Application (ArabEasy) Based on the PACMAD Model
Bagaskara, S. A., Wibowo, A. T., Izzuddin, M. A., Milad, M. K., Setyowati, R. D. N., Taufik, T., Ridwan, M., & Arifin, S. (2022) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v16i10.28433 · Cited by 8
Shear, K., Rice, H. E., Garabedian, P. M., Bjarnadóttir, R. I., Lathum, N., Horgas, A. L., Harle, C. A., Dykes, P. C., & Lucero, R. J. (2023) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.1055/a-2006-4936 · Cited by 10
Ma, J., Bhowmick, S. S., Choi, B., & Tay, L. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data · doi:10.1145/3589277 · Cited by 8
Usability testing research framework: Case of Handicraft Web-Based System
Isa, W. A. R. W. M., Lokman, A. M., Wahid, E. S. A., & Sulaiman, R. (2014) · doi:10.1109/icoict.2014.6914065 · Cited by 8
Loneliness and Social Isolation among Eldely People
Püllüm, E., & Akyıl, R. Ç. (2017) · Meandros Medical And Dental Journal · doi:10.4274/meandros.32042 · Cited by 8
Iglesias, L. J., Paredes, C. A., Sánchez, L., & Pérez–Montoro, M. (2018) · Revista Latina de Comunicación Social · doi:10.4185/rlcs-2018-1271 · Cited by 14
On‐demand recent personal tweets summarization on mobile devices
Chin, J. Y., Bhowmick, S. S., & Jatowt, A. (2019) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24137 · Cited by 8
Insights into human factor studies conducted for US FDA-approved biological combination products
Patel, R. B., Mehta, M., Pipalava, P., Dahiya, M., Singh, I., & Jose, V. M. (2019) · Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery · doi:10.1080/17425247.2019.1682995 · Cited by 8
Automated Tool for Health Utility Assessments: The Gambler II
Adejare, A. A., & Eckman, M. H. (2020) · MDM Policy & Practice · doi:10.1177/2381468320914307 · Cited by 8
Domańska, B., Vansant, S., & Mountian, I. (2020) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/17373 · Cited by 8
Human Systems Engineering and Educational Technology
Roscoe, R. D., Branaghan, R. J., Cooke, N. J., & Craig, S. D. (2017) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2639-1.ch001 · Cited by 8
Developing a BIM-based methodology to support renewable energy assessment of buildings
Gupta, A. (2013) · ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) · Cited by 8
LIFANA – toward developing a meal recommender system as a dietary support app for the elderly
Bohn, T., Ferrini, K., & Stahl, C. (2023) · International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research · doi:10.1024/0300-9831/a000795 · Cited by 7
Usability Testing of Situation Awareness Clinical Decision Support in the Intensive Care Unit
Molloy, M. J., Zackoff, M. W., Gifford, A., Hagedorn, P. A., Tegtmeyer, K., Britto, M. T., & Dewan, M. L. (2024) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.1055/a-2272-6184 · Cited by 8
Unifying Faceted Search and Analytics over RDF Knowledge Graphs
Papadaki, M.-E., & Tzitzikas, Y. (2024) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-024-02076-9 · Cited by 7
Chen, T., Chen, J., & Or, C. K. (2024) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103607 · Cited by 7
Fowler, L. A., Vázquez, M. M., DePietro, B., Wilfley, D. E., & Fitzsimmons‐Craft, E. E. (2024) · mHealth · doi:10.21037/mhealth-24-24 · Cited by 7
Ansari, G., Schärer, N., Pfau, K., Valmaggia, P., Gabrani, C., Zuche, H. C., Giani, A., Esmaeelpour, M., Yamaguchi, T. C., Feltgen, N., et al. (2025) · Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.66.11.34 · Cited by 7
Brata, K. C., Brata, A. H., & Lukman, E. P. (2019) · International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology (ICEMT) · doi:10.1145/3345120.3345155 · Cited by 7
Sacca, L., Rushing, S. C., Markham, C. M., Shegog, R., Peskin, M. F., Hernandez, B., Gaston, A., Singer, M., Trevino, N., Correa, C. C., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18179126 · Cited by 7
Korkut, E. H., & Sürer, E. (2024) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-023-00905-w · Cited by 7
Integration of mCare and T2 Mood Tracker: Illustrating mHealth Usability Testing
McCreight, S. J., Brinton, C. T., Kinn, J. T., Bush, N. E., & Hoyt, T. (2019) · Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s41347-019-00087-w · Cited by 7
Usability testing of SOLAP for Indonesia agricultural commodity
Sitanggang, I. S., Trisminingsih, R., Khotimah, H., & Syukur, M. (2019) · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · doi:10.1088/1755-1315/299/1/012054 · Cited by 7
Caron, A., Vandewalle, V., Marcilly, R., Rochat, J., & Dervaux, B. (2021) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2021.07.010 · Cited by 7
Kampe, R. T., Boonen, A. E. R. C. H., Jansen, T., Elling, J. M., Flendrie, M., van Eijk‐Hustings, Y., Janssen, M., van Durme, C. M., & de Vries, H. (2022) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-022-01833-6 · Cited by 7
An Online Training Program to Improve Clinicians’ Skills in Communicating About Serious Illness
Gautier, W. C., Abaye, M., Dev, S. P., Seaman, J. B., Butler, R. A., Norman, M. K., Arnold, R. M., Witteman, H. O., Cook, T. E., Mohan, D., et al. (2022) · American Journal of Critical Care · doi:10.4037/ajcc2022105 · Cited by 8
Harris, E., Conway, D., Jimenez-Aranda, A., Butts, J., Hedley-Takhar, P., Thomson, R., & Astin, F. (2022) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-022-01882-x · Cited by 7
Kimber, M., Vanstone, M. G., Dimitropoulos, G., Collin‐Vézina, D., & Stewart, D. E. (2022) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-022-01096-y · Cited by 7
Usability Testing an mHealth Program with Tailored Motivational Messages for Early Adolescents
Lin, C. A., Vosburgh, K. L., Roy, D., & Duffy, V. B. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15030574 · Cited by 7
Alvarez, J. F. S., Jaramillo, C. M. Z., & Builes, J. A. J. (2017) · Revista EIA · doi:10.24050/reia.v14i27.785 · Cited by 7
Having a Smarter City through Digital Urban Interfaces: An Evaluation Method
Gutiérrez, L. C. A., Martín‐Gutiérrez, J., & Guerra, M. S. D. R. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9173498 · Cited by 7
Usability Evaluation of Business Process Modelling Tools through Software Quality Metrics
Nacheva, R. V., & Jansone, A. (2020) · Baltic Journal of Modern Computing · doi:10.22364/bjmc.2020.8.4.04 · Cited by 7
Clustering for usability participant selection
Gilbert, J. E., Williams, A., & Seals, C. (2007) · Cited by 7
Involving Children in the Design of Healthcare Technology
Allsop, M. J. (2010) · White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 7
Kumar, A., Saxena, N., & Uzun, E. (2009) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0907.4743 · Cited by 7
Mondellini, M., Colombo, V. M., Arlati, S., Lawson, G., & Cobb, S. V. G. (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119865810.ch10 · Cited by 7
Glaser, S. L. C., Fraterman, I., van Brummelen, N., Tibollo, V., Del Campo, L. M., Mallo, H., Wilgenhof, S., Wilk, S., Gisko, V., Khadakou, V., et al. (2025) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/57659 · Cited by 5
Guiomar, R., Trindade, I. A., Carvalho, S. A., Menezes, P., Patrão, B., Nogueira, M. R., Lapa, T., Duarte, J., Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Castilho, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.848590 · Cited by 6
An App to Support Fathers’ Mental Health and Well-Being: User-Centered Development Study
Liverpool, S., Eisenstadt, M., Smith, A. M., & Kozhevnikova, S. V. (2023) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/47968 · Cited by 6
Saab, M. M., O’Donovan, M. R., Koç, İ., Kenny, J., Hrdlička, J., Wild, J., Zielina, M., Hrdličková, L., Rusínová, K., Loučka, M., et al. (2026) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2026.106985 · Cited by 7
Logeswaran, A., Chong, Y. J., & Edmunds, M. (2020) · Ophthalmology and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40123-020-00315-0 · Cited by 4
O’Brien, N., Crespo, R. F., O’Driscoll, F., Prendergast, M., Chana, D., Darzi, A. W., & Ghafur, S. (2024) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/50968 · Cited by 6
Assessing the Acceptance of a Mid-Air Gesture Syntax for Smart Space Interaction: An Empirical Study
Bernardos, A. M., Wang, X., Bergesio, L., Besada, J. A., & Casar, J. R. (2024) · Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks · doi:10.3390/jsan13020025 · Cited by 6
Petushek, E. J., Diekfuss, J. A., Lamplot, J. D., Mørtvedt, A. I., Hoey, L. C., Heo, K. Y., Petit, C. B., Foss, K. D. B., Warren, S. M., Slutsky‐Ganesh, A. B., et al. (2024) · Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/23259671231218964 · Cited by 6
Castro, A. R., Arnaert, A., Moffatt, K., Kildea, J., Bitzas, V. B., & Tsimicalis, A. (2021) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/34652 · Cited by 6
Gagnon‐Roy, M., Pinard, S., Bottari, C. L., Morellec, F. L., Laliberté, C., Lagha, R. B., Yaddaden, A., Pigot, H., Giroux, S., & Bier, N. (2021) · JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies · doi:10.2196/28701 · Cited by 6
Zhang, L., Tulu, B., Jenkins, S. P., Richardson, N., SHOPTAW, S. J., & Taxman, F. S. (2022) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2022.461 · Cited by 6
Semonella, M., Marchesi, G., Andersson, G., Dekel, R., Pietrabissa, G., & Vilchinsky, N. (2024) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076231225082 · Cited by 8
Denisova, E., Tiribilli, E., Luschi, A., Francia, P., Manetti, L., Bocchi, L., & Iadanza, E. (2024) · Health and Technology · doi:10.1007/s12553-024-00859-2 · Cited by 6
Probst, Y., & Tapsell, L. C. (2007) · Primary Health Care Research & Development · doi:10.1017/s1463423607000321 · Cited by 6
Aspectos de usabilidade de mobile learning voltado para usuários com restrições decorrentes da idade
Carneiro, R. V., & Ishitani, L. (2014) · Revista Brasileira de Computação Aplicada · doi:10.5335/rbca.2014.3426 · Cited by 6
Development of an online secondary prevention programme for stroke survivors: Prevent 2nd Stroke
Denham, A. M. J., Guillaumier, A., McCrabb, S., Turner, A., Baker, A., Spratt, N. J., Pollack, M. R. P., Magin, P. J., Oldmeadow, C. J., Collins, C. E., et al. (2019) · BMJ Innovations · doi:10.1136/bmjinnov-2017-000257 · Cited by 6
Brata, K. C., & Brata, A. H. (2018) · International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology (SIET) · doi:10.1109/siet.2018.8693149 · Cited by 6
Allison, R., Hayes, C. V., Young, V. L., & McNulty, C. A. M. (2020) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/14504 · Cited by 6
Brown, M., Hooper, N., Eslambolchilar, P., & John, A. M. (2020) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/22507 · Cited by 6
Shilbayeh, S. A. R., & Ismail, S. A. E. R. (2020) · Cogent Psychology · doi:10.1080/23311908.2020.1843883 · Cited by 8
Neudorf, B., Giangregorio, L., & Morita, P. P. (2020) · Ergonomics in Design The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications · doi:10.1177/1064804620982140 · Cited by 4
Handheld Optical System for Pectus Excavatum Assessment
Servi, M., Zulli, A., Volpe, Y., Furferi, R., Puggelli, L., Messineo, A., Ghionzoli, M., & Facchini, F. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11041726 · Cited by 6
Testing Facial Recognition Software for Young Adults and Adolescents: An Integrative Review
Roundtree, A. K. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77392-2_4 · Cited by 6
Influencer Takip Etme ve Bırakma Kararına Yönelik Kullanıcı Deneyimleri
TOKAY, S. B., & Akın, M. (2021) · Erciyes İletişim Dergisi · doi:10.17680/erciyesiletisim.885499 · Cited by 6
SPArK-Bot: An Educational Robotic Platform
Parikh, P., Kalamdane, S., Rasal, A., Mundada, K. S., & Kalshetti, U. (2022) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon52537.2022.9766694 · Cited by 6
Brata, K. C., Nugraha, M. H., & Brata, A. H. (2022) · International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems/International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · doi:10.11591/ijece.v12i5.pp5313-5320 · Cited by 6
Kim, K. T., Choi, Y., Cho, J. H., & Lee, S. (2023) · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.5535/arm.23017 · Cited by 6
Hayes, A. T. (2015) · Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research · Cited by 6
Lühnen, J., Haastert, B., Mühlhauser, I., & Richter, T. (2017) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-017-0616-z · Cited by 6
Schneider, W., Bolger, D. J., Eschman, A., Neff, C., & Zuccolotto, A. P. (2005) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03192699 · Cited by 6
van den Haak, M. J. (2008) · doi:10.3990/1.9789090232164 · Cited by 6
Enhancing BIM-based data transfer to support the design of low energy buildings
Cemesova, A. (2013) · ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) · Cited by 6
Quantitative Analysis of Desirability in User ExperiencePreprint
Adikari, S., McDonald, C., & Campbell, J. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.03544 · Cited by 6
Usability of VR-Systems in Cross-Cultural Product Development: A Case Study
Balzerkiewitz, H.-P., Dlamini, N. Z., Stechert, C., & Mpofu, K. (2024) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2024.03.019 · Cited by 5
Enhancing AI Explainability Through the EXACT Framework: A User-Centric Approach
Alhasan, S., & Alnanih, R. A. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3576234 · Cited by 5
Bayrakdarian, N. D., Bonar, E. E., Duguid, I., Hellman, L., Salino, S., Wilkins, C., Jannausch, M. L., McKay, J. R., Staton, M., Dollard, K., et al. (2024) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports · doi:10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100225 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Faulkner, L.
- Affiliations
- Applied Research Laboratories, The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Corresponding author
- Faulkner, Laura
- Venue
- Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 379-383
- ISSN
- 0743-3808 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5970
- OpenAlex
- W2088028234
- Semantic Scholar
- 7369703e67a6812b4476fc95f8085c4d20ebe2ff
- Cited by
- 1,053
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 95 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 8.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Persona Design and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- usability testing, sample size, number of participants, random sampling, problem identification
- MeSH terms
- Consumer Behavior, Data Collection, Humans, Product Surveillance, Postmarketing, Software, Task Performance and Analysis, User-Computer Interface, Sample Size, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
