Cited by 6Digital Mental Health InterventionsMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Usability Study of the iACTwithPain platform: an online acceptance and commitment therapy and compassion-based intervention for chronic pain

Open access
Guiomar, Raquel, Trindade, Inês A., Carvalho, Sérgio A., Menezes, Paulo, Patrão, Bruno, Nogueira, Maria Rita, Lapa, Teresa, Duarte, Joana +2 more·2022·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Background: This pilot study aims to test the usability of the iACTwithPain platform, an online ACT-based intervention for people with chronic pain, to obtain information on which intervention and usability aspects need improvement and on expected retention rates. Methods: Seventy-three Portuguese women with chronic pain were invited to complete the first three sessions of the iACTwithPain intervention assess their quality, usefulness and the platform's usability. Twenty-one accepted the invitation. Additionally, eight healthcare professionals working with chronic medical conditions assessed the platform and the intervention from a practitioner's point of view. Results: This study presented a considerable attrition rate (71.43%) among chronic pain participants, with six completers. There were no significant differences in demographic or clinical variables between dropouts and completers except for completed education (participants who dropped out presented less education than completers). Reasons for dropout were related to difficult personal events occurring during the time of the intervention, lack of time, or having forgotten. There seemed to be an overall satisfaction with both the intervention, its contents and form of presentation of information, and the platform, concerning its design, appearance, and usability. Real image videos were preferred over animations or audio by chronic pain participants. Healthcare professionals emphasized the appealing and dynamic aspects of the animation format. Conclusion: This study informs the ongoing improvement of the iACTwithPain platform and provides valuable information on aspects researchers should consider while developing online psychological interventions for chronic pain. Further implications are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.848590

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guiomar, R., Trindade, I. A., Carvalho, S. A., Menezes, P., Patrão, B., Nogueira, M. R., Lapa, T., Duarte, J., Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Castilho, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
  • University of Beira Interior (PT)
  • Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Guiomar, Raquel
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2022-07-22
Volume
13
Pages
848590-848590
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4287093356
Cited by
6
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior (POCI-01-0145)
  • Programa Operacional Regional do Centro (Centro2020)
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (01-0145, POCI-01-0145, SFRH/BD/5099/ 2020, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-, POCI-01-, /2017, CENTRO2020)
  • European Regional Development Fund (CENTRO2020, POCI-01, 01-0145, POCI-01-0145, POCI-01-0145- FEDER)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, chronic pain, online psychological intervention, usability, intervention dropout, participant satisfaction, compassion-based interventions, healthcare professional perspectives, women with chronic pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review