Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Morpho-semantic representations are supralexical and impose a morphological organization on whole-word form representations.
“As shown in Figure 5, morpho-semantic representations are supralexical representations that impose a morphological organization on whole-word form representations (Grainger et al., 1991; Giraudo and Grainger, 2001).”
From A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing (2011) · cites this paper as Giraudo and Grainger, 2001
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Drews, E., & Zwitserlood, P. (1995). Morphologicaland orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psy- chology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1098-1116.
- Feldman, L. B. (1994). Beyond orthography and phonology: Differ- ence between inflections and derivations. Journal of Memory & Lan- guage, 33, 442-470.
- Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 680-698.
- Frost, R., Forster, K., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked priming investigation of mor- phologicalrepresentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learn- ing, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1-28.
- Grainger, J., Colé, P., & Segui, J. (1991). Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 370-384.
- Laudanna, A., Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (1992). Processing inflectional and derivational morphology. Journal of Memory & Lan- guage, 31, 333-348.
- Marslen-Wilson, W., Komisarjevsky-Tyler, L., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
- Marslen-Wilson, W., Zhou, X., & Ford, M. (1996). Morphology, modality, and lexical architecture. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology. Amsterdam: Kluwer.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Đurđević, D. F., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M. (2011) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0023851 · Cited by 595 · see citing works
A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing
Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
Self-citationHebrew Brain vs. English Brain: Language Modulates the Way It Is Processed
Bick, A. S., Goelman, G., & Frost, R. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21583 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
“However, other studies demonstrate that morphological processing is clearly modulated by semantic considerations (Diependaele, Sandra, & Grainger, 2005 ; Giraudo & Grainger, 2001 ; Feldman, 2000 ).”
- Authors
- Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J.
- Venue
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 127-131
- ISSN
- 1069-9384
- 1531-5320
- Cited by
- 157
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
