The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high-and low-frequency words
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1967) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,532
The ten-twenty electrode system of the international federation
Jasper, H. H. (1958) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · Cited by 6,567
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.5.375 · Cited by 4,889
Reading Senseless Sentences: Brain Potentials Reflect Semantic Incongruity
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7350657 · Cited by 4,888
Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.
Mandler, G. (1980) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.87.3.252 · Cited by 2,849
On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.
Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.110.3.306 · Cited by 2,553
Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/307161a0 · Cited by 2,218
Interaction of information in word recognition.
Morton, J. (1969) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0027366 · Cited by 2,151
Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access.
Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.10.4.680 · Cited by 1,420
Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.10.3.340 · Cited by 1,269
Cited by
On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity
Kok, A. (2001) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1017/s0048577201990559 · Cited by 1,766
Bentin, S., Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., Giard, M. H., Echallier, J. F., & Pernier, J. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892999563373 · Cited by 725
Theta and gamma oscillations predict encoding and retrieval of declarative memory
Osipova, D., Takashima, A., Oostenveld, R., Fernández, G., Maris, E., & Jensen, O. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1948-06.2006 · Cited by 671
Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity
Curran, T. (2000) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03209340 · Cited by 697
The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data
Hauk, O., Davis, M. H., Ford, M., Pulvermüller, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.048 · Cited by 586
Metadata
- Authors
- Rugg, M. D.
- Venue
- Memory & Cognition
- Published
- 1990-07
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 367-379
- ISSN
- 0090-502X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5946
- OpenAlex
- W2077442692
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 8.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high-and low-frequency words. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3758/bf03197126
- The paper
- Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high-and low-frequency words. Memory & Cognition. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197126
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
