The DOI matches its Crossref record; 106 of the 106 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1967) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,532
Reading Senseless Sentences: Brain Potentials Reflect Semantic Incongruity
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7350657 · Cited by 4,888
Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.
Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803 · Cited by 3,792
A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory
Jacoby, L. L. (1991) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(91)90025-f · Cited by 3,696
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3 · Cited by 3,392
Implicit memory: History and current status.
Schacter, D. L. (1987) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.501 · Cited by 2,983 · cited 2×
“Donaldson & Rugg, 1998) suggest that the parietal recollection effect does not depend on intentional retrieval strategies, so the effect may be related to involuntary aspects of conscious recollection (RichardsonKlavehn & Gardiner, 1995; Richardson-Klavehn, Gardiner, & Java, 1996; Schacter, 1987; Schacter, Bowers, & B…”
BackgroundRecognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.
Mandler, G. (1980) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.87.3.252 · Cited by 2,849
On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.
Deese, J. (1959) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0046671 · Cited by 2,107
McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section · doi:10.1016/0168-5597(85)90015-2 · Cited by 1,756
A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.
Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.91.1.1 · Cited by 1,517
Cited by
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123 · Cited by 4,377
The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.2002.2864 · Cited by 3,840
Norman, K. A., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.4.611 · Cited by 1,312
Bentin, S., Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., Giard, M. H., Echallier, J. F., & Pernier, J. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892999563373 · Cited by 725
Components of episodic memory: the contribution of recollection and familiarity
Yonelinas, A. P. (2001) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0939 · Cited by 547
Metadata
- Authors
- Curran, T.
- Venue
- Memory & Cognition
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 923-938
- ISSN
- 0090-502X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5946
- OpenAlex
- W2117912679
- Cited by
- 697
- References
- 106
- FWCI
- 10.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3758/bf03209340
- The paper
- Curran, T. (2000). Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03209340
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
