Cited by 60Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

Response and encoding factors in “ignoring” irrelevant information

Open access
Flowers, John H., Warner, Jack L., Polansky, Michael L.·1979·Memory & Cognition

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03197589

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Any information not relevant to satisfying compulsions is not only meaningless but may be entirely ignored.

    “Any information not relevant to satisfying compulsions is not only meaningless but may be entirely ignored, which is consistent with observations of human behaviour [6,5] (i.e. one may be unable to perceive something in the stream of sensorimotor stimuli because it is filtered out).”

    From Compression, The Fermi Paradox and Artificial Super-Intelligence (2022) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Results and Discussion (p. 93) report that, under a suitable response condition, interference from irrelevant information could be substantially eliminated. The paper does not discuss compulsions or call such information meaningless; it also shows that irrelevant information can produce substantial interference, so it does not establish that any irrelevant information may be entirely ignored or unperceived. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [27]27. ULEMAN, J. S., & REEVES, J. Areversal of the Stroop effect through scanning. Perception & Psychophysics, 1971, 9, 293-295.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flowers, J. H., Warner, J. L., & Polansky, M. L.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Venue
Memory & Cognition
Published
1979-03
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
86-94
ISSN
  • 0090-502X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5946
OpenAlex
W2017976041
Cited by
60
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Memory & Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
irrelevant information, response mapping, stimulus-response mapping, stimulus-response compatibility, incongruent stimuli, numerosity, card sorting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review